Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

New climate bill plan laid out

Senators’ proposal seeks to gain business support

From left, Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.,  Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., and John Kerry, D-Mass., at a news conference Thursday.  (Associated Press)
Renee Schoof McClatchy

WASHINGTON – Senators working on a compromise climate bill unveiled the basics of their plan for the first time on Thursday, including encouragement for new nuclear power plants, a continued use of coal and a greenhouse gas emissions reduction target that’s lower than what the Senate had been considering.

Sens. John Kerry, D-Mass., Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Joe Lieberman, an independent from Connecticut, are looking for a plan that wins enough business support so that senators will see it as a win for the economy and a way to line up more support for it. So far Graham is the only Republican to speak favorably about the plan, and many Democratic senators also are uncertain because of worries about energy costs and jobs.

The framework was announced following weeks of talks between the three senators and their colleagues.

“The idea of unlimited carbon pollution in perpetual form doesn’t sit well with most Republicans,” but they’re concerned with the costs of limiting them, Graham said.

Success in getting enough votes to pass the bill depends on support for nuclear energy, an agreement to continue to burn coal, and a “meaningful” expansion of oil and gas drilling that adds to the U.S. supply, Graham said.

“If we can’t make this good business it won’t happen,” Graham said. “I believe we can.”

Graham said he was on board with efforts to craft a bill because he saw it as the best opportunity to reduce dependence on foreign oil and create jobs.

“I believe the green economy is coming. That’s not a question of if it’s going to happen, it’s just when it’s going to happen. The sooner the better for me, because the jobs of the future I do believe lie in energy independence and cleaning up the environment,” he said.

The White House called the framework announcement “a positive development towards reaching a strong, unified and bipartisan agreement in the U.S. Senate.”

The plan calls for emissions reductions “in the range of 17 percent below 2005 emission levels” by 2020, the same level that President Barack Obama proposed in the international negotiations. A Senate climate bill passed by the Environment and Public Works Committee without Republican support called for a 20 percent reduction by 2020.

Kerry said that the framework sends a message to the international climate negotiations in Copenhagen that the Senate will take action next year to pass a law requiring U.S. emissions reductions. A global climate treaty cannot be reached without it.

Frank O’Donnell, president of the environmental group Clean Air Watch, called the compromise “tremendously disappointing,” adding that “it reads like a coal production manifesto.”

The framework said that “coal’s future as part of the energy mix is inseparable from the passage” of the bill.” It said lawmakers would offer “significant resources” for “clean coal technology” and promote ways to capture carbon emissions and bury them underground.

Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., planned to introduce an alternative bill – a “cap and dividend” plan that would charge for pollution and return most of the money directly to Americans.