Spokane7
60°
December 11, 2009 in Nation/World
Obama’s Nobel speech offers ‘just war’ defense
President Barack Obama is applauded by Nobel Committee Chairman Thorbjorn Jagland on Thursday.
(Full-size photo)
OSLO, Norway – President Barack Obama delivered an impassioned rationale for war in accepting the 2009 Nobel Prize for Peace on Thursday, a paradox that he acknowledged, even as he defended America’s record abroad in promoting human rights, individual freedom and global security.
Just over a week after announcing an escalation of the U.S. war effort in Afghanistan, Obama spoke candidly to an audience that included European dignitaries and officials representing countries deeply opposed to the conflict.
He did not receive applause until more than halfway through his speech – and even then not for his defense of “just war” but for his decision to close the military brig at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and prohibit torture.
The remarks offered a lofty, ideological justification for his decision to send an additional 30,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan, and stood in sharp contrast to the more technical argument he made in favor of escalation last week at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. His audience reached beyond the vaulted ceilings of Oslo City Hall to electorates in the United States and Europe, where many believe the war is no longer worth fighting.
While the president invoked Martin Luther King Jr., and called himself “living testimony to the moral force of nonviolence,” Obama also recalled the advance of Hitler’s army during World War II to argue that, sometimes, only force can resolve injustice and protect civilian lives. In an echo of his predecessor, George W. Bush, he noted that “evil does exist in the world.”
“I face the world as it is and cannot stand idle in the face of threats to the American people,” Obama said in the speech, formally known as the Nobel Lecture. “To say that force may sometimes be necessary is not a call to cynicism. It is a recognition of history: the imperfections of man and the limits of reason.”
The apparent contradiction of a wartime president accepting a prize for peace provided the fulcrum for Obama’s 36-minute acceptance speech.
During the speech, Obama reprised foreign policy themes that he has spelled out previously, including the importance of working through international organizations in an age of nuclear proliferation and environmental threats.
But Obama also used the speech to acknowledge the criticism that, less than a year into his presidency, he is undeserving of a prize that has been given to “Schweitzer and King, Marshall and Mandela.”
After receiving the award with “great gratitude and great humility,” Obama reminded the audience that he is “at the beginning, and not the end, of my labors on the world stage” and cited rights activists around the world who “have been jailed and beaten in the pursuit of justice.”
“I cannot argue with those who find these men and women – some known, some obscure to all but those they help – to be far more deserving of this honor than I,” he said.
Obama honors Medal of Freedom recipients as heroes 
Marksman on December 11 at 8:08 a.m.
Yet another speech full of inappropriate pauses, aaah’s and uh’s and uhm’s. I wonder if our very own “Dear Leader” has read Kipling? “Into the valley of death rode the six hundred…” That should do it!
Megan_B on December 11 at 8:48 a.m.
He is very aware of the critisicm he is receiving for getting this award, hence the caution displayed throughout his speech, and the great humility he professes.
Only in America would we get angry that our leader was chosen for such a prestigious award.
Congratulations, Mr. President.
Marksman on December 11 at 11:11 a.m.
And I thought all the uh’s and ah’s and uhm’s were just a failure to grasp the tenets of Public Speaking! Thanks for clearing that up Megan(with an unerscore) B! Professed with great humility!
Megan_B on December 11 at 2:08 p.m.
hahahahahahahahaha
I’m laughing with you, not at you. :-) As long as you don’t call me Megan_BS I’m up for a good jab of humor!