WASHINGTON – Senate Republicans vowed Wednesday to use every available tactic to delay voting on the health care bill as Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., scrambled to unify Democrats in support of the legislation.
Democratic leaders continued to court Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., whose vote appeared to be the most elusive in the 60-member Democratic caucus; he was unsatisfied with language in the $848 billion legislation related to abortion coverage. Democratic leaders offered to revise the bill with tighter restrictions, but Nelson, an abortion opponent, said he wasn’t sure the new wording would go far enough.
Meanwhile, on the Senate floor, Republicans showed they were prepared to extend the health care debate as long as possible, with Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla. demanding that a Senate clerk read aloud a 767-page Democratic amendment sponsored by Sen. Bernard Sanders, I-Vt.
The GOP bid was foiled about three hours later, when Sanders withdrew his longshot proposal to create a Canadian-style single-payer system. But Republicans are expected to make a similar move when Reid introduces the revised Senate bill, which is likely to top 2,000 pages and which cannot be similarly withdrawn.
“We ought to take and embrace this idea of transparency and responsibility that the American people can expect every one of us to have read this bill … and certify that we have an understanding for what we’re doing to health care in America,” Coburn said.
Democrats decried the maneuver and predicted that the stalling effort would fail.
“The decision by the Senate Republican leadership today to have the Sanders amendment read clearly tells us what their strategy is,” said Democratic Whip Richard J. Durbin, D-Ill. “It is to slow down or stop this bill at any cost.”
Durbin said the Dec. 25 deadline for passage remains in place, provided Reid can lock down the 60 votes needed to overcome a GOP filibuster. “I think that we can get this done in time for each of us to be home for Christmas. That’s our goal,” Durbin said.
But Nelson told reporters Wednesday he is still undecided on the bill and won’t vote for the package “until and unless the things I’ve put before them are handled.”
According to participants in the talks, the latest revision would seek to segregate more clearly public and private funds in new insurance exchanges for individuals who do not have access to affordable employer-based coverage. Under the bill, people with incomes below 400 percent of the federal poverty level would receive government subsidies to purchase plans on the exchanges.
Nelson, along with numerous anti-abortion groups, wants an ironclad ban on using subsidies to buy policies that include abortion coverage. Such a provision would track closely with terms in the House bill, adopted over strong liberal objections. Abortion rights groups are pressuring Senate Democrats to resist such stringent rules, arguing that abortion access for all women could be threatened.
“There’s a lot of discussion going on about it,” Nelson said. “And we are now looking at language.”
Nelson told reporters that he is waiting for anti-abortion groups back home in Nebraska to weigh in.