February 11, 2009 in Nation/World

Senate OKs $838 billion stimulus bill

Senate, House negotiate differences such as federal spending, tax cuts
Washington Post
 

Region’s senators split on measure

 Washington Democrats in the Senate voted yes on the proposed economic stimulus package Tuesday while Idaho Republicans voted against it.

 Sens. Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell announced programs in the bill that would send money to Washington, including more than $495 million for roads and bridges, $648 million for education and other services that are facing reductions and $64 million in job training.

 Cantwell said the proposal contains more than $2 billion in higher Medicaid payments and money to create jobs in energy and health care, offer extra unemployment benefits and make college more affordable.

 “We still have a long way to go to get our economy back on track,” Cantwell said in a press release.

 But Sens. Mike Crapo and Jim Risch of Idaho said the bill was too expensive, even though, they said, it contained some ideas they supported.

 Crapo said he helped add $6.4 billion in cleanup money for facilities like the Idaho National Laboratories, but he still considered the bill a dangerous attempt to “spend our way to prosperity.”

 Risch said he supports a $15,000 tax credit for homebuyers but was unhappy that other changes, such as restrictions on new spending programs, were not included. “This is a giant fraud on the American people,” Risch said.

Jim Camden

WASHINGTON – Senators began talks with the House on Tuesday to determine which tax breaks and spending provisions will survive as part of a final stimulus package, but despite the optimism leaders in both chambers expressed about quickly resolving their differences, the negotiations are expected to be contentious.

Senate Democrats won passage of their version of the legislation yesterday by the narrowest of margins, leaving little room for negotiators to maneuver.

The 61 to 37 vote on the $838 billion package included three Republican “aye” votes, drawing the same three moderates – Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, both of Maine, and Pennsylvania’s Arlen Specter – who provided the only GOP support Monday on a procedural motion to bring the bill to the floor.

Democrats in the House and Senate remain broadly unified around the central provisions of the legislation, which is intended to create or save up to 4 million jobs, but several disputes could extend negotiations beyond their goal of having a finished product by the weekend.

The shuttle diplomacy had already begun before the Senate vote Tuesday afternoon. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., paid an early morning visit to the White House to discuss the bottom lines of the two versions with President Obama. The leaders continued meetings into the evening, and both sounded optimistic that a deal could be struck quickly.

“We have a clear idea of what the differences are and hope to resolve them as soon as possible,” Pelosi said after meeting Tuesday afternoon with House Democrats. She said a final bill could emerge “hopefully before the end of this week.”

The Senate’s package is about $19 billion more than the $819 billion House package. It provides less in federal spending and more in tax breaks.

On the spending side, likely flashpoints include Medicaid and school construction, both top priorities in the House that the Senate scaled back or dropped. On the tax side, the Senate included several breaks that could fall off the table, including incentives to buy homes and automobiles, along with a temporary fix to the alternative minimum tax.

The homebuyer provision, a $15,000 tax credit for the purchase of primary residences, has received substantial attention since it was added last week on a Senate voice vote. But its primary sponsor, Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., voted against the Senate bill Tuesday, giving Democratic negotiators little incentive to retain the provision, which was estimated to cost nearly $40 billion over 10 years. Democratic negotiators said the tax measure may also be scaled back drastically.

Republicans continued to protest the bill’s size and content, suggesting that the House and Senate vote totals are unlikely to grow on final passage.

“We all know this is an emergency. We’re all in favor of taking some kinds of action,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. “But I do think it’s important to focus on the larger question of: Where are we going to leave the country in two years if we take all of these steps? We will have made a dramatic move in the direction of, indeed, turning America into Western Europe.”

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus