Spokane7
58°
February 19, 2009 in Idaho
Risch had wrong mouse, district in blasting stimulus project
Senator slams nonexistent earmark
BOISE – Idaho Sen. Jim Risch blasted the federal economic stimulus bill Wednesday for being filled with big earmarks for Democratic leaders, but his prime example turned out to be in error.
“Remember, the president promised us change, and indeed we did get change,” Risch told the Idaho State Senate. “The earmarks used to be a million or 2 or 3 million dollars – in this particular bill, Nancy Pelosi’s earmark for the red-breasted harvest mouse, which you’ve probably never even seen because it only exists in her district, to save that is $50 million.”
The problem: There’s no such earmark in the bill, and the endangered salt marsh harvest mouse – which isn’t red-breasted – isn’t found in Pelosi’s district.
Drew Hammill, spokesman for Pelosi, called the story about the mice “a total fabrication.”
It apparently originated a week ago in talking points distributed by Republicans in Congress, charging that $30 million would go to the mouse. That was the figure the California State Coastal Conservancy, a state agency, had put together to show the total of its “shovel-ready” restoration projects eligible for stimulus funding in the San Francisco Bay Area, none of which are in Pelosi’s district.
Brad Hoaglun, Risch’s director of communications and senior adviser, said, “That’s good to know – I’ll make sure the senator doesn’t say it anymore. … This was something that last week everyone was saying was in the bill. It was part of talking points that circulated on Capitol Hill.”
The coastal conservancy hopes to apply for stimulus funds granted to NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, for the projects, which include flood control and access work along with habitat restoration for fish, birds and more.
Dick Wayman, the conservancy’s communications director, called the mouse story “absurd.” He said, “We have this huge project and … people were picking out this one minor aspect of it, a cute little mouse – it sounded like we were idiots.”
Hoaglun said the issue shows the complexity of the 1,100-page stimulus bill, something Risch demonstrated to Idaho lawmakers when he dropped a full copy of the bill – a foot-high stack of paper held together with several rubber bands – on the lectern in the state Senate.
“You should take into close consideration the stimulus package and what effect it’s going to have in the budget, but don’t do it until you’ve read the stimulus bill, not only read the stimulus bill but studied the stimulus bill and know it paragraph by paragraph and page by page,” Risch declared, slapping his hand on the tall stack of papers.
Asked if he’s read the stimulus bill, Risch said, “I did read parts of it, but only parts. It’s 1,100 pages long. … And reading a bill is not like reading a novel. It’s difficult reading.”
Risch, like all members of Idaho’s congressional delegation, voted against the bill.
He also decried the inclusion of what he called an $8 billion earmark in the bill for a project favored by Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, a “magnetic, levitating, high-speed train from Disneyland to the Las Vegas strip.” Reid does favor such a train, and the project received a $45 million earmark in the transportation bill that President Bush signed last June.
According to the Washington Post, the stimulus bill contains $8 billion for high-speed rail, which could include the Las Vegas project and others.
In an interview, Risch said the thing that’s surprised him most about the debate over the stimulus was “the partisan nature of it.” He said, “There is no middle ground. … The other side’s answer to everything is, ‘We win.’ ”
“We’re in serious times in this country, there isn’t anyone who disagrees with that,” Risch said. But, he said, “You’re not going to spend your way out of it. … It’s too simple, it can’t work that way.”
Popular beaches to become cleaner 
xuthal1 on February 19 at 12:10 p.m.
Dear Senator Risch,
Having just read your comments (in the Spokesman Review) regarding the Stimulus Package, I am left wondering why you represent the great State of Idaho. Did your constituents elect you to distort facts, fling hyperbole, and do ideological hystrionics? Or did they elect you to do good works for the people of Idaho and the Nation?
Your comments regarding the salt marsh harvest mouse are a case in point. First, there is no such animal as the “red-breasted harvest mouse” that you invented in your floor speech. The salt marsh harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys raviventris), is, however, an actual species. Second, no individuals of this species exist within Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s 8th Congressional District, which only includes the city and County of San Francisco.
The salt marsh harvest mouse lives in intact marshland systems with a high degree of vegetative cover, a habitat that does not exist anywhere within the highly developed industrial shoreline of California’s 8th Congressional District. Where the mouse does live however, is along the shorelines of the other eight Counties that line San Francisco Bay. Maybe that’s where you got confused. I’d encourage you to visit the San Francisco Bay Area in order to be better informed on the geography here.
Further, the Stimulus Package does not mention the salt marsh harvest mouse at all, but rather, directs $30m (not the $50m you mentioned) to the Army Corps of Engineers to disperse to the California Coastal Conservancy to complete work on the largest wetland restoration effort to the west of the Mississippi, the South Bay Salt Ponds Restoration effort. This effort seeks to restore the pre-development characteristics of a portion of the San Francisco Bay shoreline, characteristics that include flood protection, water quality, and overall ecosystem health. Within the constructs of this effort, many species, most notably humans, but also other mammals, birds, fish and various other wildlife will benefit. The number of jobs created by this effort will reach into the hundreds.
I doubt that any of this factual information will even reach you. Maybe the staffer that is reading this will get some better handle on this issue. Doubtless your ideological bent will trump the real facts of the case. Nevertheless, if the type of ludicrous rhetoric you used to defend your position on the Stimulus package is indicative of the Republican Party’s level of intellectual and philisophical depth in regards to the real and pressing issues facing our Nation, I do hope that yours will continue to be the minority voice.