Arrow-right Camera
Subscribe now

Local rights proposal illegal

The Spokesman-Review

Simply put, the so-called bill of rights Spokane City Charter change proposed by Envision Spokane is illegal. It violates the single-subject rule of City Charter Section 13. The Envision Spokane plan is “logrolling.” Logrolling is the political game of putting separate subjects together in a package to secure as many votes as possible on the package.

One need only ask this to understand Envision Spokane’s problem: Just what is the single subject of “affordable health care” and neighborhood “veto” of a property owner’s development plans? What is the single-subject connection between “affordable housing” and the provision of legal standing (right to sue) to inanimate objects?

But apart from this legal issue, just what is the purpose of Envision Spokane? It seems to be a form of River Park Square for the little guy. Great, who is going to pay for it, and why does one think government, especially local government, can be told to provide this “bill of benefits.” Just who are the taxpayers who are going to pay for such local largesse?

Stephen Eugster

Spokane



Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-3815

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy