Spokane7
58°
June 29, 2009 in City
Spokane hires first police ombudsman
After years of debate, Spokane on Monday hired its first independent police ombudsman.
But exactly how independent and effective the new overseer can be remains part of a contentious debate.
About ten citizens told the Spokane City Council Monday that they would be wasting city money if they hired Tim Burns, the neighborhood preservation officer in Visalia, Calif., as the city’s first ombudsman because city rules don’t give him the power to conduct independent investigations of police actions.
“We need real oversight and not just public relations,” said Teresa Torosian, a board member of the Sovereignty, Health, Air Water and Land Society.
The six council members present at the meeting said they agreed that Burns should have full investigative power like Boise’s police ombudsman. But they said the rules were crafted after long negotiations with the Spokane Police Guild, and the job is better than no ombudsman at all.
“If we don’t start this process it’s not going to happen,” said Councilman Bob Apple.
The council voted 6-0 to appoint Burns to a three-year term. He will be paid about $95,000 a year. Council members also agreed that if Burns serves out his term without being reappointed, the city would pay for his moving expenses back to California, or offer him a different position. Mayor Mary Verner noted that among Burns’ powers is the ability to participate in interviews during police invesigations of misconduct. He also will review police policies.
“I don’t support any further delay because I do want our community to have independent police oversight as soon as possible,” Verner testified to the council.
Officials blamed state law regarding bargaining with unions for the lack of independent investigatory powers.
Still, Danek said the city does not plan to put the issue on the table during negotiations between the city and guild for the union’s contract starting Jan. 1 because budget shortfalls are taking precedence.
“Until we try the program, we don’t know that any changes are needed,” Verner said in an interview. “… There’s significant authority of the ombudsman in the existing ordinance.”
Spokane resident Marianne Torres said hiring Burns, a former police officer, would be like “a fox watching the chicken coop.”
Council President Joe Shogan argued with Torres during her testimony and eventually asked a police officer to escort George McGrath, a frequent city council attendee, from the chamber after he could be heard commenting negatively from the audience.
“It’s an absolute whitewash,” said McGrath after he left the meeting peacefully. “There is nothing that is being accomplished for the citizens.”
City Councilwoman Nancy McLaughlin said Spokane should have the same system Boise has and asked the audience to raise their hands if they preferred delaying a hire and risking waiting before an ombudsman position is created with full independent investigatory authority. But Shogan warned McLaughlin she’d be out of order if the poll was taken.
McLaughlin eventually sided with hiring Burns.
“I want it to get better, but I also don’t want to stop the process that we started,” she said.
MAC faces angry crowd 
George_Sands on June 29 at 11:37 p.m.
Council President Shogun also said under his breath “take your own good time” when refering to Mr. Volder being slow walking up to the podium.
It was clear that the Council has no clue on how the Ombuttsman is going to interface or operate. This all should have been ironed out long ago and be in terms and conditions of the contract.
The term “participate” in investigations leaves a lot of wiggle room that I’m sure the Guild is going to constrain.
More smoke an mirrors from the curved desk.
jenny on June 30 at 3:40 a.m.
That’s a good salary for someone who has no authority to do anything. How many more times are the citizens going to have to picket and protest before it sinks into the heads of the City Council that the ombudsman needs some authority? It’s a joke otherwise. Nothing will change. I guess the federal investigators will have to step in as usual and as they are doing anyway for the Otto Zehm case. They will also have to step in for the Shonto Pete case and the Joshy Levy incident and more people who have been harmed and killed unneccessarily by the bad cops. All the times the bad cops have been getting away with drunk driving incidents and other violations of the law and police policy. It isn’t the policies that are wrong, it’s the fact that the police have been getting away with violating the policies and not following them. What part of “follow the rules,” don’t they understand? IT’s as plain as day that the guild runs the city. Does anyone have any authority anywhere or does just the guild have the authority?