Arrow-right Camera
Subscribe now

Two movements not parallel

The Spokesman-Review

Rebecaa Nappi’s posing of parallels between the women’s rights movement and the pro-fatherhood movement (June 21) falls victim to an innate inconsistency.

The fatherhood movement is about parenting, much-needed, effective and involved fathering.

On the contrary, the women’s rights movement at its best is about un-parenting, about making women feel inadequate if they are not striving for careers in the realms of business and commerce, in academic pursuits, or in medicine or law – anything but homemaking and child-rearing. And at its radical worst the women’s rights movement portrays the child as the enemy of woman, as a hindrance to her realizing and expressing her proper societal role as redefined according to the tenets of radical feminism, an inconvenience to be eliminated by abortion.

It is not without cause that the birth rates among certain significant demographic groups in the U.S. are at less than replacement levels.

Leonard C. Johnson

Moscow, Idaho



Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-3815

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy