March 6, 2009 in City

Court dismisses Brown’s tax-hike fight

Senator says I-960 violates state constitution
Richard Roesler Staff writer
 

OLYMPIA – Declining to wade into a Senate dispute, Washington’s highest court Thursday rejected Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown’s challenge to an anti-tax ballot measure.

The unanimous ruling leaves in place a high hurdle for lawmakers who want to increase taxes, but Brown and other lawmakers say they probably would have sent any major tax hikes to voters anyway.

Thursday’s decision leaves them little choice.

Voters in 2007 approved Initiative 960, a Tim Eyman ballot measure that reaffirmed a controversial requirement for a two-thirds vote by lawmakers to approve a tax increase. I-960 said of lawmakers couldn’t get two-thirds approval, they’d have to send the proposal to voters.

The test case came last year, when the Senate voted 25 to 21 to re-enact an expired liquor tax. Lt. Gov Brad Owen ruled that the measure hadn’t gotten the needed two-thirds vote. Brown went to court.

It would have been easy for Brown – who heads the Senate’s large Democratic majority – to muster a simple majority vote to overrule Owen. The rules allow that.

But Brown said Thursday she disagreed with Owen’s interpretation of the law. She thought the law was unconstitutional.

Her argument was simple. The state constitution says a majority vote is enough to pass a tax hike. And a ballot measure can’t amend the constitution.

But the high court never even got to that argument. Writing for the court, Justice Mary Fairhurst said the justices “will not referee disputes” within the Senate. For the courts to wade into an internal legislative decision, she said, “would be a grave violation of separation of powers.”

The court dismissed Brown’s case.

“I still believe it’s unconstitutional,” Brown said Thursday of the two-thirds requirement. “That’s disappointing. On the other hand, I don’t think it really changes the outcome of where we’re headed in this legislative session.”

Republican lawmakers, who’ve been arguing for a no-new-taxes solution to the state’s unprecedented $8 billion budget shortfall, cheered the ruling.

“It’s great news, especially as we’re hearing talk of new taxes to fill the state’s budget hole, that the public will be protected from the Legislature passing huge tax hikes by a simple majority vote,” said Senate Minority Leader Mike Hewitt, R-Walla Walla.

Eyman also said he was pleased.

“The court properly stayed on the sidelines in this dispute,” he said.

If the two-thirds requirement had been lifted off legislators, Eyman said, “I haven’t got a doubt in my mind that they would have jacked up taxes right there on the spot.”

Richard Roesler can be reached at (360) 664-2598 or richr@spokesman.com.

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus