May 28, 2009 in Nation/World

Group appeals Prop 8 ruling in federal court

Challenge brought by unlikely allies
Carol J. Williams Los Angeles Times
 
Associated Press photo

Attorneys Theodore B. Olson, left, and David Boies announce a federal court challenge to Proposition 8 during a news conference in Los Angeles on Wednesday.
(Full-size photo)

Spurned by the California Supreme Court, gay couples wanting to marry appealed to the federal courts Wednesday to strike down Proposition 8 as unconstitutional state interference in a citizen’s fundamental right to lawful wedlock.

The lawsuit, brought by two high-powered lawyers and unlikely allies, former Bush administration Solicitor General Theodore Olson and his Bush-v.-Gore opponent David Boies, was met with some skepticism about the conservative Olson’s motives for getting involved in a rights battle usually spearheaded by liberals.

The challenge brought in U.S. District Court in San Francisco also worried gay-rights advocates, who have avoided taking the issue to federal court because of the predominance of conservative judges on the federal bench and the risk of adverse rulings.

A coalition of nine gay-rights advocacy groups called the suit “premature” and warned that without more groundwork, the U.S. Supreme Court doesn’t seem likely to rule that same-sex couples are entitled to marry. The groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union, Lambda Legal and Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, urged those disappointed by Tuesday’s ruling upholding Proposition 8’s ban on gay marriage to pursue their rights through another voter initiative or the Legislature.

“Test cases can blow up in your face,” said Matt Coles, head of the ACLU program on gay-rights issues. “It was a test case that enshrined separate-but-equal in the U.S. Constitution for 58 years. Test cases don’t always work, and you have to make a thoughtful judgment about whether to raise them or not.”

Olson and Boies, acting as co-counsel for the first time in their long, distinguished careers, argued that inaction for fear of a setback in the federal courts was unacceptable at a time when gay couples, like the clients who silently flanked them at a news conference, are being denied the fundamental right of marriage.

“There will be many people who will think this is not the time to go to federal court,” Olson conceded when asked why he was ignoring the advice of the civil rights groups. Noting his record arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court – 54 cases – and Boies’ successful career as a litigator, Olson asserted: “We think we know what we are doing.”

“Reasonable minds can differ, but when you have people being denied civil rights today, I think it is impossible as lawyers and as an American to say, ‘No, you have to wait. Now is not the right time,’ ” Boies added.

Olson, allied with conservative groups like the Federalist Society, was challenged as to his reasons for taking up the cause of same-sex-marriage rights.

“I don’t think I’ve ever been part of any organization that was anti-gay or felt that a group was not entitled to equal rights,” replied Olson, who has spent most of his career with Los Angeles-based Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. “I hope that people don’t suspect my motives.”

Boies vouched for the sincerity of his erstwhile opponent, saying Olson was “committed in his heart and soul to equality.”

The suit filed by Olson and Boies on behalf of a lesbian couple from Berkeley, Calif., Kristin Perry and Sandra Stier, and gay partners Paul Katami and Jeffrey Zarrillo of Burbank, Calif., was assigned to U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker in San Francisco.


Thoughts and opinions on this story? Click here to comment >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email