WASHINGTON – Federal health officials said Tuesday a popular variety of heartburn medications can interfere with the blood thinner Plavix, a drug taken by millions of Americans to reduce risks of heart attack and stroke.
The Food and Drug Administration said the stomach-soothing drugs Prilosec and Nexium cut in half the blood-thinning effect of Plavix, known generically as clopidogrel.
Regulators said the key ingredient in the heartburn medications blocks an enzyme the body needs to break down Plavix, muting the drug’s full effect. Procter & Gamble’s Prilosec OTC is available over-the-counter, while AstraZeneca’s Nexium is only available with a prescription.
“Patients at risk for heart attacks or strokes who use clopidogrel to prevent blood clots will not get the full effect of this medicine,” the agency said in a statement.
Plavix is marketed by Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb. With global sales of $8.6 billion last year, it’s the world’s second-best selling drug behind Pfizer’s cholesterol drug Lipitor.
Because Plavix can upset the stomach, it is often prescribed with stomach acid-blocking drugs.
The FDA says patients who need to reduce their acid should take drugs from the H-2 blocker family, which include Johnson & Johnson’s Mylanta and Boehringer Ingelheim’s Zantac. FDA scientists say there is no evidence those drugs interfere with Plavix’s anti-blood clotting action.
Nexium and Prilosec are part of a class of drugs known as proton pump inhibitors, but FDA regulators said they don’t have enough information to say whether other drugs in that class shouldn’t be used with Plavix.
“There’s not enough data to tell us how those drugs interact with” the enzyme that activates Plavix, said Mary Ross Southworth, FDA’s deputy director for safety of cardiovascular products. “There are ongoing studies looking at those other drugs.”
The FDA said the warnings on Plavix have been strengthened based on a 150-patient study submitted by Sanofi over the summer.
But some consumer advocates said the agency’s action fell short, arguing that regulators should have placed the information in a “black box” warning label, the most serious available.