November 30, 2009 in Sports

Wulff laments missed chances

Dropped passes hurt in Apple Cup shutout
By The Spokesman-Review
 

PULLMAN – As was the case for much of the Washington State University football season, the Cougars missed their opportunities Saturday against Washington in the Apple Cup.

Well, maybe missed isn’t the right word. Dropped might be better.

“I think we dropped eight or nine balls that were huge,” WSU coach Paul Wulff said in his last Sunday news conference of the 1-11 season.

“It didn’t allow us to score points, it didn’t allow us to get first downs, to keep the chains moving,” Wulff said before struggling for an explanation. “I don’t know. We hadn’t dropped that many. I don’t know if it’s nerves or what was the case.”

The result was the Cougars were shut out for the first time this season, and it came at the hands of a Washington team that was yielding 31 points a game. The Huskies came into the 102nd Apple Cup with the Pac-10’s second-worst defense, statistically, ahead of only WSU.

But both defenses earned Wulff’s praise.

“You’ve got to give Washington some credit,” Wulff said of the Huskies, 4-7 overall, 3-5 in Pac-10 play with a home game left versus Cal. “They lined up and they got after us pretty good there.”

And he wanted to do the same for the Cougar defense, which used just three substitutes all game.

“Our defense played pretty darn good,” Wulff said.

“We did some great things on defense, got a little worn down in the fourth quarter, a lot like we did the week before.”

The Huskies rushed for a season-high 265 yards, 94 of those, also a season-best, from quarterback Jake Locker, which played a part in the WSU defense wearing out.

But the Cougar offense’s inability to run the ball – 47 yards on 28 carries – also played a big part.

“We intentionally tried to slow the game down,” Wulff said. “When you only have three D-linemen that can truly function, that are healthy, we had to shorten the game. … We had to manage the clock. It’s not what we want to do, ideally, but it gave us the best chance to keep our defense fresh.

“If we had converted on offense, the plan would have worked very well. We just didn’t convert.”

The Cougars didn’t have many chances to win in a 0-9 Pac-10 season, falling behind after the first quarter by an average of more than two touchdowns in conference games.

Wulff is waiting until his player meetings are finished to rehash the season, but once again Sunday he held out hope for the future.

“There’s a lot of potential,” he said. “We just need to see how it all unfolds.”

One comment on this story so far. Add yours!
  • h2olydog on December 02 at 1:57 p.m.

    Wow. “Competitively mediocre” seems to be the goal for UW/WSU nowadays. Poor Cougs weren’t even that. For all that was said about the UW last year being so bad, I didn’t think there could be a worse Pac10 team. As with the Huskies last year, the only way to go is up for the Cougs. But, sadly, this is the problem-improving from terrible to just competitive isn’t the true end goal, despite the claims by coaches to be doing just that. If that were the case, Wulff should be let go immediately. WSU backtracked so far, it will to need use the best GPS and hire a group of sherpas to find its way back to respectability. The UW and WSU are where the Ducks and Beavers were pre-‘00, or so. Middling along with an occasional bowl. The real truth everyone fails to realize is there’s not enough access to talent and coaches that stay put for consistent winning/recruiting to keep all four NW schools (and Boise St.) above .500 every year as happens to the big schools to the south. Cal, SC, UCLA, Arizona/ASU, will always have the regional talent pool advantage. Now that Oregon’s got Nike money it has turned the corner, as will Cal, to keep the winning going. UW lost its chance to improve and remain a consistent power with the mess that played out after the Don James-winning years, and has regressed. Oregon State, and WSU have had their days, but will always find it difficult to do what the Ducks and Dawgs have-and will-do in the future. If it were the SEC/Big10+1/Big12ish, the maniacal fan base would be more demanding. But that is the one silver lining to the NW Pac10 schools that want a team just to ‘compete’: mediocrity seems to be good enough…

You must be logged in to post comments.
Please create a profile or log in here.