October 20, 2009 in Nation/World

Feds back off medical marijuana

Prosecutors told not to pursue charges against caregivers, seriously ill
Carrie Johnson Washington Post
 
Associated Press photo

A worker at the San Francisco Medical Cannabis Clinic prepares packets of marijuana buds for sale Monday.
(Full-size photo)

More on this topic

Background and the latest updates

Where it’s legal

States that allow some use of marijuana for medical purposes are Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.

WASHINGTON – Attorney General Eric Holder directed federal prosecutors Monday to back away from pursuing cases against medical marijuana patients, signaling a broad policy shift that drug reform advocates interpret as the first step toward legalization of the drug.

The government’s top lawyer said that in 14 states with some provisions for medical marijuana use, federal prosecutors should focus only on cases involving higher-level drug traffickers, money launderers or people who use the state laws as a cover story.

The Justice Department action came days after the Senate’s second-highest-ranking Democrat introduced a bill that would eradicate a two-decade-old sentencing disparity for people caught with cocaine in rock instead of powder form. Taken together, experts say, the moves represent an approach favored by President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden to put new emphasis on violent crime and the sale of illicit drugs to children. Legislation that would cover a third administration commitment, to support federal funding of needle exchanges, is moving through the House.

The announcement set off waves of support from advocacy groups that have long sought to relax the enforcement of marijuana laws. But some local police and GOP lawmakers criticized the change, saying it could exacerbate the flow of drug money to Mexican cartels whose violence has spilled over the Southwest border.

In a statement, Holder asserted that drug traffickers and people who use firearms will continue to be direct targets of federal prosecutors but that, on his watch, “it will not be a priority to use federal resources to prosecute patients with serious illnesses or their caregivers who are complying with state laws on medical marijuana.”

The turnaround could pave the way for Rhode Island, New Mexico and Michigan to put together marijuana distribution systems for residents in their states, according to Graham Boyd, director of the Drug Law Reform Project at the American Civil Liberties Union. Advocates say marijuana use can help alleviate pain and stimulate appetite in patients suffering from cancer, HIV-AIDS, and other ailments. But the American Medical Association since 2001 has held firm to a policy opposing marijuana for medical purposes.

Under the Controlled Substances Act, which is more than three decades old, marijuana remains within the category of drugs most tightly restricted by the government. Donna Lambert, who is awaiting criminal trial in San Diego County Superior Court for allegedly providing medical marijuana to another patient, injected a note of skepticism into Holder’s announcement. In an interview, Lambert noted that senior administration officials earlier this year had made public comments in line with the Justice Department policy, only to have law enforcement agents, including the Drug Enforcement Administration, take part in raids soon afterward.

Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance, said he and other advocates would watch closely whether federal agents will refuse to participate in joint raids or send other signals to district attorneys in the states that allow some medical use of marijuana.

Americans for Safe Access, which supports medical marijuana programs nationwide, estimated that during the Bush administration federal authorities conducted 200 raids in California alone. A 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case made clear that the federal government has the discretion to enforce federal drug laws even in states that had approved some relaxation of marijuana statutes for sick patients.

In Washington state, voters approved a medical marijuana initiative in 1998 that permits the possession or cultivation of a personal 60-day supply. It’s a different system from that of California, where public dispensaries have proliferated.

“There are not the retail storefronts in Washington,” noted Martin Martinez, the executive director of the Seattle-based Cascadia NORML, adding that the Obama administration appears “a little more supportive” than the Bush administration did.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs, at a daily briefing in Washington, declined to address “what states should do” in response to the Justice Department guidance. But Gibbs said the president since January had outlined his medical marijuana policy and that the Justice Department memo, signed by Deputy Attorney General David Ogden, helped to fill in the details.

Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said that the Justice Department guidelines “fly in the face of Supreme Court precedent and undermine federal laws that prohibit the distribution and use of marijuana.”

“We cannot hope to eradicate the drug trade if we do not first address the cash cow for most drug trafficking organizations: marijuana,” Smith said.

The new policy memo is part of the priority-setting that happens in every new Justice Department. During the Bush administration, for instance, federal prosecutors were encouraged to pursue child pornography and immigration cases.

Now, individuals “with cancer or other serious illnesses who use marijuana as part of a recommended treatment regimen” will not be deemed worthy of prosecution, the policy memo says. Neither are “those caregivers (who) in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state law provide such individuals with marijuana.”

McClatchy contributed to this report.

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus