The Spokesman-Review

Letters to the Editor

Follow ethical path

It may be a novel approach to consider the health care dilemma from an ethical perspective, but it’s worth a try.

In his prescient, provocative “Man for Himself – an inquiry into the psychology of ethics,” psychoanalyst Eric Fromm suggests we are guided by either authoritarian or humanist ethics. Authoritarian ethics are facilitated by a dominant figure or force that persuades one to make a judgment determined by that force, often against the best interests of the one making that judgment. Humanist ethics requires one to think for oneself, after exposure to a wide array of ideas, in terms of what’s best for mankind.

Those led by authoritarian ethics, described by educator Robert Hutchins as having the “trained incapacity to think independently” – vulnerable to demagogic politicians, Rush Limbaugh and Fox News personalities – appear indifferent to the 46 million uninsured Americans, and unmoved by insurance-related health care rationing and bankruptcies.

Those guided by humanist ethics want what’s best for all Americans – a single-payer Medicare-for-all health care plan, that is wellness, rather than sickness oriented.

If health care in America is, indeed, an ethical issue, which path shall we choose?

Buell Hollister

Spokane



Want to respond? Submit your own letter to the editor »

Click here to comment on this story »


Sections


Profile

Contact the Spokesman

Main switchboard:
(509) 459-5000
Customer service:
(800) 338-8801
Newsroom:
(509) 459-5400
(800) 789-0029