September 22, 2009 in Region
Appeals court to hear R-71 disclosure case
OLYMPIA — State lawyers will travel to California to argue that petitions for Referendum 71 should be made public.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has granted Attorney General Rob McKenna’s request for a fast-track appeal. A hearing is scheduled for Oct. 14 in Pasadena, Calif.
R-71 asks voters to either approve or reject a new law expanding domestic partnerships for gay couples.
The referendum’s conservative sponsors want to keep their signed petitions out of public view, because they fear harassment from gay-rights supporters.
A federal judge in Tacoma granted the sponsors’ request earlier this month. But …
You have viewed 20 free articles or blogs allowed within a 30-day period. FREE registration is now required for uninterrupted access.
Registration Required
- log in to your Spokesman.com account for unlimited viewing and commenting access.
- Don't have a Spokesman.com account? Create a Spokesman.com profile and register for FREE access.
-
S-R Media, The Spokesman-Review and Spokesman.com are happy to assist you. Contact Customer Service by email or call 800-338-8801
OLYMPIA — State lawyers will travel to California to argue that petitions for Referendum 71 should be made public.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has granted Attorney General Rob McKenna’s request for a fast-track appeal. A hearing is scheduled for Oct. 14 in Pasadena, Calif.
R-71 asks voters to either approve or reject a new law expanding domestic partnerships for gay couples.
The referendum’s conservative sponsors want to keep their signed petitions out of public view, because they fear harassment from gay-rights supporters.
A federal judge in Tacoma granted the sponsors’ request earlier this month. But McKenna is appealing, citing the state’s open-government laws.

Spokane7
Win big with the NEW Spokane7!
Celtic Woman is coming to Spokane
Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.
You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.
comments powered by Disqus