April 10, 2010 in Letters

Paper victimizes officers

The Spokesman-Review
 

The two letters written by Spokane police officers (April 1) are right on.

However, the Spokesman’s response leaves a lot to be desired. Instead of coming out and saying the suspect was not a victim but a criminal intent on killing his relatives if he hadn’t been stopped by the police, you say the word “victim” was written by an editor and not the reporter, as if that makes a difference? If anything, it is worse when you consider the “editor” should have better sense and had enough time to determine if this person was really a victim or a criminal before the paper was published. I’ll bet that comment makes the police officers that put their lives on the line really feel good.

Many readers never get past the headlines or secondary headlines and assume the person was just “another” victim of the police. The police have enough problems without help from The Spokesman-Review or the ever-helpful Doug Clark.

Wayne Lythgoe

Colbert

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus