Arrow-right Camera
Subscribe now

GM still in arrears

The Spokesman-Review

Let me get this straight. General Motors walked away from hundreds of billions of dollars owed creditors in a government-arranged prepackaged bankruptcy. Sorry, creditors.

Then the government arranged for taxpayers to turn their heads and cough up $50 billion of TARP money for GM. In this $50 billion TARP loan, GM was to agree to pay back a small $6.71 billion in a predetermined time frame with interest. It is from GM’s $50 billion TARP fund that they withdrew the $6.71 billion to repay their loan “early.”

Now, GM and the Obama administration are claiming GM has repaid their government loan. They have only paid a small portion of their debt with loan money from a bigger debt. Sorry, taxpayers. Now I wouldn’t be surprised to see GM go to extremes with rebates (taxpayer-funded) and zero-interest financing through the government-supported finance arm of GM, GMAC. Sorry, Ford.

Before I am mandated to buy a government/union-owned GM car, I plan on expressing a small degree of dissatisfaction with the Obama administration this coming November.

Ken Hills

Spokane



Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-3815

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy