January 23, 2010 in City
Water planners look ahead
UW, Corps of Engineers study new ways of using dams
GRANTS PASS, Ore. – As the climate gets warmer, the old rules for when to let water out of Columbia Basin dams and when to hold it back won’t work.
So researchers from the University of Washington’s Climate Impacts Group and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have developed computer models that simulate new operations schedules for flood control dams in Washington, Idaho, Montana and Canada based on a climate change scenario.
As the climate warms, there will be less snowpack and it will melt earlier, requiring different schedules to maximize dam operations, Alan Hamlet, a University of Washington research assistant professor in civil and environmental engineering, said Friday from Seattle.
“What the projections show for the Pacific Northwest is that as we warm, the region will tend to lose snowpack in the springtime,” he said. “The result is river flows shift from summer to wintertime. You get an increase in winter flows, decreased and earlier peak (spring) flows and less flow in summertime. It is really coming from the fact there is less snow.”
Dam operations are not being changed yet. But the simulations are showing how to make the dams better serve the needs of power generation, irrigation, salmon and recreation as the climate changes, said Carolyn Fitzgerald, chief of water management for the Corps of Engineers Seattle District.
“This is research that looks at whether this would be an effective way of dealing with potential changes in the runoff pattern,” she said. “And the approach shows promise.”
The simulations are based on long-term climate forecasts from the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, with a temperature increases of 3.6 degrees by 2050.
The current system is based on past flow patterns and short-term water forecasts.
The simulations look at major flood control dams high in the watershed, such as Grand Coulee Dam in Washington, and do not look at run-of-the-river dams on the lower Columbia, which have little capacity for flood control, Hamlet said. They work on an optimization principle that automatically adjusts for the changing climate.
“It’s very complicated to rebalance this system,” Hamlet said. “You can’t do it by hand. That’s why we developed this very sophisticated tool.”
© Copyright 2010 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Spokane7


Ron_the_Cop on January 23 at 2:06 p.m.
Really! The AP should fact check the entities that are providing these numbers. Perhaps there is a shift underway?
January 22, 2010
Climategate: CRU Was But the Tip of the Iceberg
By Marc Sheppard
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/climategate_cru_was_but_the_ti.html
Ron_the_Cop on January 23 at 8:52 p.m.
BREAKING NEWS: scientist admits IPCC used fake data to pressure policy makers
23 01 2010
The IPCC is now damaged goods. Pachauri is toast, and nobody will be able to cite the IPCC AR4 again without this being brought up.
The Daily Mail’s David Rose in the UK broke this story, it is mind boggling fraud to prod “government action” and grants. Emphasis in red mine.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/23/breaking-news-scientist-admits-ipcc-used-fake-data-to-pressure-policy-makers/