Spokane7
33°
July 22, 2010 in City
County to fight river lawsuit
Treatment plant depends on contested EPA regulations
Water spills over the Spokane River Avista North Channel Dam on Wednesday.
(Full-size photo)
Spokane County plans to oppose a federal lawsuit that could impair its ability to open a new sewage treatment plant in January 2012.
Commissioners moved to defend the county’s interests after learning late Tuesday that Post Falls and the Hayden Area Regional Sewer Board had sued to block new Spokane River water quality standards.
The county will be represented by the regional Foster Pepper law firm, which helped the county negotiate the new regulations.
The Idaho dischargers’ lawsuit, filed Friday in U.S. District Court in Boise, names only the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
In May, the EPA approved the standards developed by the Washington Department of Ecology to regulate the total maximum daily load of contaminants allowed into the river.
The lawsuit asks the federal court to hold the TMDL regulations in abeyance while deciding whether to declare them invalid.
Implementation of the regulations, aimed at reducing oxygen-robbing contamination, would allow the county to get a discharge permit for the treatment plant it is building.
Much of the incorporated and unincorporated Spokane Valley faces a construction moratorium if the treatment plant’s opening is significantly delayed.
Post Falls, the Hayden sewer board and Coeur d’Alene view the standards as a threat to growth.
The Coeur d’Alene City Council voted Tuesday to join the litigation.
Boise attorney Gary Allen, who represents Post Falls and the Hayden sewer board, declined to comment on the lawsuit.
The complaint seeks to overturn the standards on 15 counts, including allegations that they place a disproportionate burden on Idaho dischargers.
Regulators say the standard actually is the same for all dischargers, but problems with statistics, computer modeling and testing frequency create an apparent discrepancy between large and small dischargers.
However, regulators acknowledge their explanations have been unconvincing.
Department of Ecology spokeswoman Cathy Cochrane said environmentalists made that point Wednesday in a meeting of a dozen interested organizations and government agencies.
“It was obvious that we do need to rephrase for the Idaho dischargers and politicians so they understand why there’s that difference,” Cochrane said.
Even Sierra Club spokeswoman Rachael Paschal Osborn said the standards are more stringent for Idaho dischargers.
“The model that they have used has been played with and manipulated,” she said in an interview. “You really kind of wonder what assumptions have gone into it.”
However, Osborn agreed with Spokane County officials that implementation of the new regulations should not be delayed.
“That would be terrible because there are some things that need to be done,” Osborn said. “While we have concerns about the TMDL in some respects, we certainly would not want to see all work stop.”
The Sierra Club thinks the standards are too lenient, but Osborn said the group hasn’t decided whether to file a lawsuit of its own.
Meanwhile, Avista spokeswoman Anna Scarlett said the utility has no plan to challenge the TMDL regulations.
The company will be required to pick up some of the river cleanup burden previously limited to dischargers. Avista’s dams trap contaminants, such as phosphorus, that feed oxygen-consuming algae.
“We will stay engaged as these appeals go through the process so we can protect Avista’s interests,” Scarlett said.
Doug Krapas, environmental manager for Inland Empire Paper, said the company, which has a mill that discharges into the river at Millwood, will resort to litigation only as a “last-ditch effort” to stay in business.
Krapas said Inland Empire Paper – owned by the Cowles Co., which also owns The Spokesman-Review – can’t meet the new standards with available technology. To comply, mill officials need a proposed program for trading phosphorus-elimination credits.
Christine Psyk, regional EPA assistant watershed director, said her agency will continue working with Washington and Idaho environmental regulators to develop a trading program. However, she said the lawsuit will “put a damper” on the effort by siphoning resources and inhibiting discussions.
Psyk said EPA officials were disappointed that the Idaho dischargers didn’t wait for final details before suing.
“It’s in the permits that all this will flesh itself out, and it would be good if the dischargers would wait to see what those permits look like,” Psyk said.
The EPA issues discharge permits in Idaho, while in Washington, the task falls to the state Department of Ecology.
If the court does not hold the regulations in abeyance pending the lawsuit’s outcome, Cochrane said the DOE expects to issue permits to existing Washington dischargers within a month.
Spokane County’s application for a permit would be expected about the same time. State officials would have six months to review the application.
After public review, the county could receive its discharge permit next spring or summer, Cochrane said.
Recent stories by John Craig
County districts nearly equal in population after latest adjustment December 27, 2011 1- Prosecutor defends decision-making December 14, 2011 44
- Man ignites fuel tank with torch, burns house December 11, 2011 9
- Fire forces temporary shelter evacuation December 11, 2011
- Murder trial delayed months while judge, prosecutor feud December 11, 2011 8
WSU Text-to-Win Contest 
EWU Text-to-Win Contest 
Enter to win tickets to see Adam Carolla at the Knitting Factory 
cdspokesreader on July 22 at 6:48 a.m.
Why is Spokane County hiring a law firm from Seattle for this case?
Orange on July 22 at 7:17 a.m.
Because there’s no real talent in Spokane that can handle this.
spokanecommunistparty on July 22 at 10:25 a.m.
Dear Inland Paper Company, please consider donating all your beautiful forested mountainous lands to the Spokane County Parks Department as a Conservation Area, I’m sure all Spokane’s way cool citizens would truly enjoy this treasure for generations to come. Thanks =)
liarsinnews on July 22 at 11:56 a.m.
Leave it to the Cowles Dynasty to cry wolf and state if they are forced to live up to the law, they may have to close the paper mill. They tried the same crap during the River Park Square scandal when they got caught breaking the law and were penalized saying if the penalty was not reduced they would file for bankruptcy and the ship of fools at Spokane city hall believed the lie. Shut down the Inland Paper Mill. Call their bluff.
Spokane_Citizen on July 23 at 6:35 a.m.
As usual, Dick, you have no accurate knowledge of which you speak….you’re just what the people who actually keep the world moving forward refer to as ‘one of the barking seals’.
D Statler on June 07 at 7:20 a.m.
The papermill should not be directly discharging into the river anyway. Allowing this behavior from buisnesses like KAISER and INLAND PAPER is a very real problem. History itself supports that these buisnesses are not capable of monitoring or cleaning up after themselves. Every drop of effluents discharged from these heavy poluters needs to run thru our NEW treatment facilities.Their portion of discharge into the river could be used for our new county treatment plant. Forcing these buisnesses to live with the same standards as the rest of us will not close their doors.It will force a hard look at their current failing policies and behavior. If all these sue happy whiners spent their money protecting the river instead of waisting dollars hiring fat cat lawyers. The real issue of insuring the future health of our beautiful river would be much easier.
It has been years since I have seen any efforts to physically clean up the river behind AVISTA dams.Profits are soaring!