March 6, 2010 in City

Senate delays vote on tax plan

By The Spokesman-Review
 
To read the blog report of the Senate debate on taxes, visit the Spin Control blog. Click here.

OLYMPIA – After more than four hours of sometimes contentious debate over a proposal to raise taxes on consumers and a wide range of businesses, Senate Democrats and Republicans put off for at least a day a vote on the overall plan.

They debated whether the $805 million in extra taxes was the biggest in state history, whether it would kill jobs or save essential services, and whether it should get voter approval before taking effect.

Minority Republicans had amendments challenging almost all the 21 different tax changes, and while a few Democrats like Chris Marr, D-Spokane, joined them on most points, they were seldom able to muster enough votes to make significant changes.

Except one: After repeatedly questioning whether the increased sales tax would be temporary as Democrats insist, Sen. Joe Zarelli, R-Ridgeview, proposed an amendment that would strip legislators of their per diems during session if the tax doesn’t end in 2013. It passed, apparently unanimously, on a voice vote.

That was a rare moment of agreement in an afternoon that featured some sharp disputes and heated words. Sen. Mark Schoesler, R-Ritzville, leapt to his feet when Sen. Adam Kline, D-Seattle, said Republicans’ rhetoric smacked of “new McCarthyism.” Sen. Lisa Brown, D-Spokane, objected when Sen. Pam Roach, R-Auburn, called the tax bill “vindictive and predatory.”

Lt. Gov. Brad Owen, who presides over the Senate, several times warned legislators to “temper their remarks” and speak to the issues, not impugn each other’s motives or character.

Among the tax changes are an extra three-tenths of one percent on the sales tax now levied on all consumer goods through July 1, 2013; extending the sales tax to bottled water; raising the business and occupation tax paid by service industries to 1.75 percent from 1.5 percent of gross receipts; changing laws that cover out-of-state firms that use in-state “direct sellers.” It removes some exemptions for individual companies or specific industries, but offers some tax credits and savings for small businesses and low-income residents.

Along with some $800 million in budget cuts, it’s a balanced approach to the state’s budget problems and spreads the burden around, Brown said. After Republicans said repeatedly it was the largest tax increase in history, she said that’s wrong. The largest came in 1981, when the state also faced a bad economy – and when the GOP controlled the Legislature and the governor’s mansion.

A three-tenths of 1 percent sales tax increase is 3 cents on a $10 purchase, or 30 cents on a $100 purchase, she said.

But it’s not just a third of a cent, countered Sen. Cheryl Pflug, R-Maple Valley, “it’s another third of a cent.” For construction firms, farmers or large industries buying big ticket items, “three-tenths of a percent is real money,” said Schoesler.

In one of their last gambits, Republicans Don Benton of Vancouver and Janea Holmquist of Moses Lake tried an amendment to hold off any tax increases unless the voters approved them in November. The right of referendum was important to the state’s pioneer founders who came West to get away from oppressive governments in the East, Benton said.

“They knew how dangerous and tyrannical a government can be,” he said.

But Sen. Ken Jacobsen, D-Seattle, corrected Benton’s history. Referendum wasn’t in the state’s constitution until 1913, he said.

Sen. Rodney Tom, D-Medina, said members should vote for the bill if they support it and against it if they oppose it: “Don’t build budgets around referendums.”

But in the end, senators delayed vote on the overall bill, probably until Sunday afternoon. Majority Democrats hold 31 seats in the Senate, but in a sign they may have the bare minimum of 25 votes needed to pass the tax increases, they called for a recess because one of their members Sen. Paull Shin, D-Lynnwood, was absent to attend a family funeral.

Four comments on this story so far. Add yours!
  • Albert on March 06 at 6:50 p.m.

    The more I read about Senator Marr, the more I like him. It is refreshing to see someone on “our side”. How sad to see that we will pay more taxes and fees. I personally will be doing more shopping in Coeur d’Alene where fuel and sales taxes are far less than Washington. Wake up Ms. Brown… businesses will leave, the “rich” will relocate, then what?

    Chef Gus…did you get my email?

  • misjustice on March 06 at 9:06 p.m.

    Be care Albert. Next thing you know, Washington lawmakers will be arresting you for tax evasion. That’s what they do to people who cross the state line and buy tobacco in Idaho. They also confiscate any contraband you may have purchased. Plus they fine you for the tax evasion.

    Just wonder what ever happened to the “United” State of America. Where free trade in any state was okay.

  • Albert on March 06 at 9:47 p.m.

    Hello Gramma, good point. I “sometimes” head over to Coeur d’Alene for lunch etc. and buy some “stuff” from Costco and most assuredly tank up at a minimum .30 per gallon savings. If most folks follow this pattern and do like I plan to do, i.e., purchase a month’s supply of paper goods, fuel, supplies, etc. then, like myself, they will spend about $500. I will save “about” $30. at this level in sales tax and fuel tax. The normal food items we will purchase as needed in Spokane throughout the month. The sad point is that the Costco, Home Depot, Wally’s etc. outlets in Spokane will not get these revenues - Idaho will. To save $30.+ for an hour’s drive is worth it to me, a person on a very limited income. This tax increase will not hurt the wealthy one bit, it will impact the retired (me), businesses, and in the end, employees who will be laid off. All for what? Really dumb when you look at the entire picture. Please also keep in mind that the sales tax in Spokane at this very moment is just short of 10%. If this new state sales tax is passed, then we will pay the full 10% and then some. That’s just too much tax.

  • WillyPeter on March 07 at 9:27 a.m.

    Keep voting for ‘Lisa Brown for tax increases.’ Rest assured you’ll get your wish.

You must be logged in to post comments.
Please create a profile or log in here.