Spokane7
26°
March 21, 2010 in City
Council shifting on future of Y site
Waldref joins members supporting conservation
Support appears to have grown on the Spokane City Council to bring open space to the site of the downtown YMCA.
A slight majority said this week that they lean in favor of accepting county Conservation Futures money to reserve the land for Riverfront Park.
But the council won’t vote until March 29, and council members say it’s too early to predict an outcome given the ever-changing debate.
“It’s going to be one of those votes where we won’t know where it stands until the vote is taken on the dais,” City Councilman Steve Corker said earlier this month. “I wouldn’t put a dollar on the table.”
Twice last year, park officials expected the council to support Conservation Futures, and both times the City Council delayed a decision to pursue private development for the property.
City Councilwoman Amber Waldref said she believes open space is the best option for the land and that Conservation Futures money is a legitimate way to preserve views of Spokane Falls.
She joins Corker, Council President Joe Shogan and Councilman Bob Apple, who say they lean in favor of Conservation Futures, a county program that collects property taxes to preserve open space.
Council members Richard Rush and Jon Snyder argue that the Conservation Futures money that would be spent to buy the Y could be used to buy 1,000 acres or more in a more natural state elsewhere. Councilwoman Nancy McLaughlin has argued in the past that the land should be used to build an attraction.
The Spokane Park Board put down $1 million to buy the YMCA in 2006 to prevent the land from being sold to a developer who proposed to build condos on the site, which is surrounded by the park. In 2008, park leaders won support from the county park board to use Conservation Futures to pay off the remaining $4.3 million on the building, but the Spokane City Council has blocked that effort.
County commissioners say their offer will be off the table April 1.
If the city accepts the county money, the Y would have to be torn down and the property converted to a natural condition.
Late last month, an online movement advocating the use of the YMCA for an aquarium sprouted on Facebook. Since it started less than a month ago, the “Spokane aquarium” page on Facebook has gained more than 3,300 fans – more than any local TV station or newspaper.
Erik Nelson, a computer animation producer for children’s television who lives in Spokane, started the page. He said in an e-mail interview that after researching the topic, he’s discovered that the YMCA building couldn’t support the weight needed for an aquarium, and the land holds too many restrictions and parking problems.
“The property should be part of a reclamation project to return it to as close to its natural state as possible,” he said.
But Nelson said he’s serious about building an aquarium in Spokane.
“The site of the current YMCA building is a rally point,” Nelson said. “We are looking at other sites that show great potential and are in the process of vetting them. We are also looking at what the appropriate size of the aquarium should be that would meet the needs of the Inland Empire.”
Trio charged in Bonner County homicide 
Enter to win tickets to see Adam Carolla at the Knitting Factory 
WSU Text-to-Win Contest 
EWU Text-to-Win Contest 
liarsinnews on March 21 at 8:25 a.m.
The ship of fools, i. e. the city council, don`t get it. Let the private sector purchase the Y and generate tax revenue instead of continuing their reckless spending habits.
spyder3010 on March 21 at 11:38 a.m.
Fools? Studies (and common sense) have demonstrated that the isolation of the Y site precludes any chance of successful private (or, public for that matter) use or occupancy. It’s hard to squeeze tax revenues from a failed enterprise. Selling would also violate state law — the city’s plans call for the space being used for a public purpose, and under state law, the city must act and spend according to its plans. Seems “the ship of reason” to me.
Mr. Adams apparently misses one other fact. The money will be spent regardless of the Council’s actions. The only question is, “Where will it be spent?” City taxpayers contribute to the CF Fund. Why shouldn’t we get the use of some of our money within our city?
zerla on March 21 at 8:28 p.m.
I LOVE the idea, even though I opposed buying the racetrack. The racetrack is an operation—and government shouldn’t buy an organization and try to run it. If the council was wanting to build their own condos and run them, I’d oppose.
However, buying land and conserving it has been a valid cause since Teddy Roosevelt. In it’s own way, it DOES generate money for the city, if they preserve it correctly. More and more businesses and families will want to relocate a city with beautiful park space.
If Spokane was to get it in their mind to create a “Central Park”, like that in New York, they’d create a tourist destination. Think of it it: carriage rides, equestrian trails, walking trails, bicycle rentals—a thriving natural space in the midst of the city. The more it’s used, the safer it will be. We need to make it beautiful, natural and usable.