May 5, 2010 in Idaho

Ad puts bailouts in spotlight

Ward also vows to back ban on federal earmarks
By The Spokesman-Review
 

On the Web

Watch the ad at vaughnward.com/stop- reckless-spending-tv-spot.

Stay on top of the latest news from Idaho’s capitol at spokesman.com/boise.

BOISE – In a new TV commercial airing across the 1st Congressional District, GOP candidate Vaughn Ward says “the only way to stop reckless spending” by the federal government is to “end government bailouts and ban earmarks.”

The campaign ad, Ward’s second of the campaign and the first to hit the North Idaho airwaves in the race, is prompting discussion about how Ward and others would approach congressional earmarks and about whether ending earmarks and bailouts would actually solve the federal budget problem.

“I think it’s a critical way and a very important way; whether it’s the only way I guess is debatable,” said Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan balanced-budget group in Washington, D.C. The Concord Coalition, an influential bipartisan balanced-budget advocacy group based in Arlington, Va., takes a different tack. “Bailouts and earmarks are a very, very, very small part of the problem,” said Josh Gordon, policy director for the coalition. “The real federal budget problem is a long-term imbalance between spending and revenue.” Gordon estimated that earmarks make up less than 1 percent of the federal budget.

“Most people agree that earmarks are directing spending that would otherwise happen to specific locations – it’s not that they’re additional spending,” he said. The practice does, however, “tend to increase cynicism about why and how politicians make their decisions,” he said.

Ward’s call in his ad to “ban earmarks” echoes “what Walt Minnick said successfully two years ago,” said Jim Weatherby, political scientist emeritus at Boise State University, who noted that Rep. Minnick, currently Idaho’s 1st District congressman, followed that pledge up by refusing to propose any earmarks in Congress, even if it cost his state money.

Minnick is the only member of Idaho’s four-member congressional delegation to take that stand. He’s also its only Democrat.

Ward said he, too, would refuse to propose earmarks under the current process and called for various reforms to make the earmark process more transparent.

State Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Eagle, Ward’s opponent in the GOP primary contest for a chance to challenge Minnick, said he opposes congressional earmarks, but he questioned whether Ward does. “I think if there’s any special projects that need to go to a specific area, it should be voted on by itself,” Labrador said. “I like Walt Minnick’s position on this, actually, but I haven’t decided yet what my position would be. I’m opposed to them, and I believe I would oppose any earmarks, even if it’s still a part of the system.”

Ward said he believes Idahoans view earmarks as “a process that’s being abused.” He said, “By eliminating earmarks do you balance the budget? No, you don’t, but it’s part of the problem of what’s broken in Congress.”

Government bailouts, no matter how the term is defined, also are just a small part of the nation’s budget-balancing problem, said the Concord Coalition’s Gordon.

“Somewhere over half a percent but less than 5 percent of the long-term problem is really related to just the last two years of short-term government responses to the economic crisis,” he said.

Ward’s ad comes out strongly against bailouts; it was filmed several weeks before a Boise newspaper reported that his wife works for the mortgage giant Fannie Mae, recipient of a large federal bailout. Ryan O’Barto, Ward’s campaign spokesman, said Ward opposes bailouts regardless. “He would vote against any bailouts in the future, even if it means his wife loses her job,” he said.

Gordon said the nation’s budget crisis will worsen when, in two to three decades, health care costs and an aging population push spending on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid far above revenues or economic growth. “We advocate some mixture of spending cuts and revenue increases to achieve stability in long-term debt, so that we’re not taking on more debt faster than economic growth,” he said.

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus