Arrow-right Camera
Subscribe now

Sterling’s sweet deal

The Spokesman-Review

With Sterling’s books dripping with red ink, the Fed told them to recapitalize and add assets to their balance sheet. First the Treasury Department gave them TARP money and then Sterling found an investment partner, Thomas H. Lee, to help them recapitalize. But as part of the deal, Thomas H. Lee said they needed to get the Fed to forgive $228 million of the TARP funds.

What this means is Sterling gets a gift of $228 million from the taxpayers to make up for their incompetent business practices.

What happened to free market capitalism where if you make poor business decisions you go belly up? Are the executives at Sterling going to take a pay cut to show their thanks? Not likely. If you have a mortgage with Sterling that is under water, are they going to forgive the debt? Not likely.

Where is the outrage from the tea party group about the socialism of giving $228 million of taxpayers’ money to Sterling Financial? It seems we have socialism when it comes to bailing out the banks and capitalism when it comes to helping people who have mortgages underwater.

Richard Johnson

Spokane



Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-3815

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy