November 8, 2010 in City

Feds delay decision on Idaho wolf killing

Associated Press
 
Tags:Butch Otterendangered speciesgray wolveshuntingIdaho fish and gameU.S. Department of InteriorU.S. Fish and Wildlife Servicewolf huntingwolf managementwolves
More on this topic

Background and the latest updates

Aiding elk populations

 Fewer than 2,000 elk live in the Lolo Zone, biologist say, and that population fell after a steep drop in the mid- to late-1990s attributed to harsh winters, habitat changes, and predation by bears and mountain lions.

 State officials contend the elk population would have rebounded if not for wolves.

LEWISTON – The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service won’t be able to respond to Idaho’s petition to kill wolves in the upper Clearwater River Basin as soon as hoped, an agency official says.

Brian Kelly, director of the federal agency’s office in Boise, said he recently learned the agency has to conduct a National Environmental Policy Act review of the petition before making a decision.

“We are working as expeditiously as possible,” Kelly told the Lewiston Tribune.

“The intent is to make a decision so the state can do it at a time of year it is more effective to do it.”

Idaho officials submitted the petition in August to kill up to 50 wolves in the Lolo Zone with the goal of boosting elk populations. States are allowed to remove wolves if they are harming deer or elk herds.

But the state must prove the action is warranted and win approval from the federal government. Idaho submitted the petition after a federal judge restored Endangered Species Act protections to wolves, precluding an Idaho wolf hunting season.

When wolves were under state management, more than 180 were killed in Idaho during a hunting season, but only 13 were from the Lolo Zone.

The state wants to kill 40 to 50 wolves in the Lolo Zone and then keep the population at 20 to 30 wolves for five years.

© Copyright 2010 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Recent stories in City
One comment on this story so far. Add yours!

  • Bob_Knows on November 08 at 9:40 a.m.

    Now if Simpson and the Republican House would just eliminate the budget for the EPA before they implement Obummer’s Cap and Tax by fiat rather than by vote of Congress. The House can’t eliminate the EPA, but they do not have to fund it. Simpson, do you read these comments? Kathy hyphenated? We are Taxed Enough Already.

You must be logged in to post comments.
Please create a profile or log in here.