November 16, 2010 in City

Courts back Spokane law enforcement in 3 cases

By The Spokesman-Review
 

Spokane area law enforcement prevailed in three cases, including two involving allegations that officers used excessive force, today in federal court proceedings.

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in favor of the city in the case of John Burton v. City of Spokane. In that case, Burton alleged that Spokane Police officers conducted an improper strip search and had a policy of performing similar searches without warrants.

In 2005, police searched Burton during a drug investigation. No drugs were found in the search. The lawsuit also alleged officers uttered disparaging remarks. Burton claimed that his rights were further violated when a female officer was allowed to observe the search.

In an unrelated case, U.S. District Judge Robert Whaley dismissed a lawsuit brought by Ronald Campbell, who alleged that two officers used excessive force during an arrest in April 2005 when the officers prevented Campbell from swallowing a plastic baggie they believed contained drugs.

“Our officers must make critical decisions nearly every day as they go about their work,” Chief Anne Kirkpatrick said in a news release.

“It validates what we have known all along – that our officers acted appropriately and in accordance with the law in both cases,” Kirkpatrick added.

Meanwhile, in yet another unrelated case, U.S. District Judge Fred Van Sickle dismissed a case brought by Joachim Petrolino against the Spokane County Sheriff’s Office.

In that case, Petrolino – who moved to Spokane from Germany and speaks limited English – alleged that two corrections deputies took him to the ground and administered knee strikes that broke his ribs after Petrolino refused to sign his booking papers following domestic violence arrest in 2004.

Petrolino alleged in court records that he didn’t want to sign the document because he believed they wanted him to sign a confession.

The case entered its second day of trial today when Van Sickle agreed with a motion made by attorneys representing Spokane County to dismiss the case.

Attempts to reach Petrolino’s attorney, Gary Stenzel, were unsuccessful.

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus