November 22, 2010 in Nation/World

Pat-downs of airline travelers will continue

TSA chief admits full-body searches are ‘invasive’
Jim Puzzanghera Los Angeles Times
 
Associated Press photo

Passengers move through the line at a security checkpoint at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport in Atlanta on Thursday. The Transportation Security Administration’s pat-downs have drawn vehement opposition.
(Full-size photo)

Jet engine fails

 NEW YORK – A Moscow-bound flight carrying about 200 people returned safely to John F. Kennedy Airport after an engine failed Sunday night, authorities said. No one was injured.

 Delta Flight 30 reported one engine had failed shortly after takeoff, said Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman Laura Brown. The plane departed at about 4:40 p.m. with 193 passengers and 11 crew members, Delta Air Lines said.

 The plane dumped fuel before landing back in New York at about 5:50 p.m., Brown said.

Associated Press

WASHINGTON – Despite the uproar over intrusive pat-downs of some airline travelers – even Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday she would not want to undergo one – the policy will not change heading into the holiday travel season, the head of the Transportation Security Administration said.

“Clearly, it’s invasive; it’s not comfortable,” John Pistole said in an interview Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union With Candy Crowley.”

But he said the agency was trying to strike the right balance between privacy and security to protect the nation from terrorist attacks.

“No, we’re not changing the policies … because of the risks that have been identified,” Pistole said. “We know through intelligence that there are determined people, terrorists who are trying to kill not only Americans, but innocent people around the world.”

The TSA this month began more aggressive pat-downs, including checking sensitive areas such as the groin and breasts for signs of weapons or explosives on some travelers. The searches have sparked outrage, as has the TSA’s alternative – greater use of full-body scanners that the American Civil Liberties Union has said amounts to a “virtual strip-search.”

An Internet-based campaign has called for airline passengers to refuse the full-body scans on Wednesday, the busy travel day before Thanksgiving, opting instead for pat-downs, which could cause huge delays at airports.

Asked Sunday if she would submit to one of the new pat-downs, Clinton said on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” “Not if I could avoid it. No. I mean, who would?”

But Clinton said Obama administration officials were trying to find the right way to respond to terrorists “getting more creative about what they do to hide explosives in, you know, crazy things like underwear.”

President Barack Obama said Saturday that he asked his counterterrorism team each week if the measures they’re taking were “absolutely necessary.”

But Pistole said the new procedures were necessary to stop terrorist attacks. He admitted the new pat-downs were “more intrusive.”

“To some people, it is demeaning,” he said. But Pistole said very few passengers go through the new pat-downs – only those who set off alarms going through airport screening machines.

“So you just have to make sure you take everything out of your pockets,” he said. “So if there’s no alarm, there’s no pat-down.”

Hours after the CNN program, according to the Associated Press, Pistole issued a statement saying the agency would work to make screening methods “as minimally invasive as possible.”

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus