October 8, 2010 in Idaho

Allred takes Otter to task on school cuts

Challenger’s new ad says ‘it didn’t have to happen’
By The Spokesman-Review
 
TV commercial
Watch the ad at Eye on Boise.

BOISE – Keith Allred, the Democratic candidate for governor of Idaho, is going after incumbent Butch Otter with a new TV commercial targeting Otter for this year’s school funding cuts.

It’s the same theme Allred hit in his previous ad; Idaho cut school funding an unprecedented 7.5 percent this year.

“We have a great country and a great state because we’ve invested in education,” Allred says in the new commercial, which features him talking in a “town meeting” question-and-answer session.

Otter has made similar statements; both candidates have stressed the importance of education, which Idaho’s state constitution makes a prime function of its state government. “It’s about time he finally gave credit to Gov. Otter for investing in education,” said Otter’s campaign spokesman, Ryan Panitz.

In the ad, Allred continues, “This is a governor who doesn’t get it when it comes to the priority that education is. He cut education for the first time in Idaho history, a whopping seven and a half percent, while also trying to raise taxes. It didn’t have to happen.”

It’s true that Otter and the Legislature cut public school funding by 7.5 percent this year, although Otter notes that other programs took deeper cuts. But the tax increase that Otter championed, a gas tax hike to fund road maintenance, was pushed unsuccessfully in the two previous years, the 2009 and 2008 legislative sessions. Otter made no gas tax proposal this year, instead opting to appoint a task force that will make recommendations in December, after the election.

Jim Weatherby, political scientist emeritus at Boise State University, said, “The timing here is off. It’s clear he’s talking about 2010 here, but then using a 2009 reference. It’s not completely accurate.”

The claim about cutting education for the first time is something even Otter acknowledges. Idaho cut general funds for public schools the previous year by $68 million, a first, but that year, the difference was mostly made up with federal stimulus funds, leaving schools with an overall funding increase of a fraction of a percent. This year’s cut is a drop in total funding for schools.

Allred’s claim that “it didn’t have to happen” refers to his position that the state shouldn’t have low-balled tax revenue projections for this year, forcing deeper cuts, and should have funded more tax collectors to pursue uncollected taxes, a move the Tax Commission says would bring in millions.

Panitz said, “Gov. Otter stands behind his record of fiscal responsibility. … We can’t spend more than we have.”


There is one comment on this story. Click here to view comment >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email