Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Bert Caldwell: Costs high, benefits higher in saving Sterling

The successful recapitalization of Sterling Financial Corp. may well be the best economic news of 2010 for Spokane.

Thanks in part to that “bailout” we all say we hate.

In raising $730 million, the corporate parent of Sterling Savings Bank assured the retention of more than 600 local jobs. Many more were potentially in jeopardy across a five-state, 178-branch system assembled during a succession of mergers that produced $12.7 billion in assets.

But relentless expansion also took Sterling into Bend, Boise, Southern California and other markets among the hardest hit by collapsing real estate values. The set-aside of $223.8 million for loan losses pushed Sterling’s 2008 earnings into the red, snapping a streak of profitable years going back to its formation as a savings and loan in 1983.

To help cope with those losses, Sterling in December had received $303 million in additional capital by tapping the U.S. Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program. The centerpiece of the federal government’s financial rescue package, TARP invested more than $200 billion in the nation’s banks before the borrowing window was closed by the financial reform bill passed in July. Much more money went to AIG, Chrysler, GM and other companies on the verge of ruin but “too big to fail.”

Sterling was the biggest TARP beneficiary in the Northwest. It was also the region’s biggest home-grown bank. Mighty Washington Mutual Bank, undone by scandalously reckless lending practices, was history.

Washington banks, including the corporate parents of Inland Northwest Bank and Washington Trust, received almost $1 billion in TARP money. Several of those not considered healthy enough to qualify for TARP have since been taken over the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the Washington state Department of Financial Institutions.

Had Sterling failed, the Treasury probably would have lost 100 percent of its $303 million. Instead, the department consented to accept a fraction of that amount as an inducement to new investors. That was a turning point in the recapitalization effort. Within weeks, institutional investors Thomas H. Lee Partners and Warburg Pincus Equity Partners X, L.C., were in, to be followed by 30 individuals, among them new Sterling Chairman Les Biller.

The Treasury will end up owning slightly less than 10 percent of Sterling. Until all 4.2 billion shares of the recapitalized bank begin trading, putting a precise value on that holding would be guesswork. But the special inspector general appointed to monitor TARP said in a July quarterly report that the Treasury would take a $227.3 million “haircut” on its Sterling investment, assuming a 75 percent markdown. The discount will be more like 80 percent.

The FDIC stood to lose much more. Closing Everett-based Frontier Bank in April sapped an estimated $1.3 billion from the deposit insurance fund, and Frontier was less than one-third the size of Sterling.

Last week, the FDIC announced its deposit insurance fund had improved to a negative balance of $15 billion.

So, with either the Treasury or the FDIC likely to take a bullet if Sterling did not remain open, Treasury will take the hit. If the department chooses to keep its shares and Sterling’s new management team can return the bank to its glory years of uninterrupted profitability, it may well be that the Treasury will recover more of its investment.

The Congressional Budget Office last month estimated losses on the total $475 billion TARP outlay would amount to $66 billion, about one-half the cost of the savings and loan rescue effort of 20 years ago. That’s good news for taxpayers and reason for many to get down from their high horses regarding Wall Street bailouts.

Yes, the fat cats took us for a ride. Make that take us for a ride. We saved their bacon. But the money center banks, excepting Citigroup, have repaid their TARP money in full, plus dividends and capital gains. The hundreds of troubled banks on FDIC’s watch list are, like the struggling savings and loans of two decades ago, out here in the hinterlands.

Bailing got Sterling back on dry ground and helps keep at least 10 other Washington and Idaho banks above water, employing and lending in cities and towns all over the Northwest.