August 14, 2011 in Sports

Pac-12, Big Ten: No consensus on ‘plus-one’

Bud Withers Seattle Times
 

Commissioners of the Big Ten and Pac-12 conferences denied Saturday that athletic directors in their leagues found consensus on a proposal for a “plus-one” format that would change the mechanics of the Bowl Championship Series.

The Seattle Times reported that the directors, meeting early last week in Newport Beach, Calif., discussed several scenarios for input into the next BCS contract, including the status quo. It was reported that in a nonbinding straw vote, they expressed interest in a plus-one proposal.

Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany told the Chicago Tribune the report was “erroneous” and Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott said “the characterization was incorrect.”

Multiple sources told the Seattle Times the directors, beginning the process of information-gathering and discussion before negotiation of the next BCS contract, were in accord on more consideration of a plan in which four teams would be seeded annually into semifinal games, with the winners playing in a title game.

In this scenario, the Rose Bowl wouldn’t host semifinals, in exchange for the right to have an annual Big Ten-Pac-12 matchup.

There was considerable sentiment, a source said, to preserve the status quo. But the same source said there was “consensus almost unanimously on the plus-one,” among several options to tweak the system.

With approval of conference presidents required, and with more discussion to come, any action by the athletic directors would be nonbinding and not even a recommendation. But it could represent a possible future shift in position of two conferences that have traditionally opposed any form of playoff.

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus