February 27, 2011 in Features

Oscars: Likable bunch; so who do you like best?

Rafer Guzman Newsday
 

A king, a cowboy, a criminal, a mountain climber and a ladder climber – those are the five roles that earned this year’s best actor Oscar nominees their honors.

Audiences often conflate stars with their roles, and this year it seems that the more likable the character, the better the actor’s chances of taking home the award.

The actor: Jesse Eisenberg, “The Social Network”

The deal: Eisenberg found the role of a lifetime in Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook. Unfortunately, the backstabbing, overly ambitious character is almost more villain than hero.

The actor: Javier Bardem, “Biutiful”

The deal: He plays a father who also happens to be a small-time crime lord in the Spanish-language drama. Don’t expect his surprise nomination to become a win.

The actor: James Franco, “127 Hours”

The deal: As real-life outdoorsman Aron Ralston, who was forced to cut off his own arm to survive, Franco is charming and funny. But voters may not be able to remember much beyond the gruesome amputation scene.

The actor: Jeff Bridges, “True Grit”

The deal: Having won this award last year for the country-music drama “Crazy Heart,” Bridges is riding a wave of goodwill. In the Coen brothers’ Western, he plays U.S. Marshal Rooster Cogburn, the same role that earned John Wayne his award for the 1969 original. Still, two Oscars in a row is a rare feat.

The actor: Colin Firth, “The King’s Speech”

The deal: The shoo-in for best actor has been playing attractive charmers for years (“Bridget Jones’s Diary,” “Love Actually”) and came close to winning this award for the 2009 drama “A Single Man.” As the stammering King George VI, Firth has drawn raves for his sensitive, empathetic performance. The role, and perhaps the actor, could be characterized as an underdog who comes out on top. What’s not to like?


Thoughts and opinions on this story? Click here to comment >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email