Spokane7
65°
July 12, 2011 in Region
Montana questions Exxon’s estimate of oil spilled
BILLINGS, Mont. — Montana environmental regulators have asked Exxon Mobil to justify its estimate for how much oil spilled into the Yellowstone River, citing the company’s changing timeline on how long it took to stop a leaking pipeline.
The Texas-based company estimates between 31,500 and 42,000 gallons of crude flowed into the Yellowstone near Laurel on July 1, fouling the shoreline and backwaters along dozens of miles of the scenic river.
Exxon Mobil Pipeline president Gary Pruessing initially said it took six minutes to shut down the pumps on the Silvertip pipeline. But information submitted by the company to federal pipeline safety regulators later revealed it took almost an hour to fully stop the flow.
In a letter to Exxon Mobil executives, Montana Department of Environmental Quality Director Richard Opper asked for an explanation of why the spill volume was not changed given the longer timeline.
“Since the event occurred, ExxonMobil has increased its estimate of the duration of the spill event 10-fold from its original assertion,” Opper wrote. “Despite this revision as to the duration of the event, ExxonMobil has not revised its estimate as to the volume of the spill into the river.”
Exxon Mobil representatives said last week the spill estimate was based on the correct timeline. Spokeswoman Cynthis Bergman said Tuesday the company believes its prior estimate was correct.
The estimate included oil lost after the pumps were shut down but before a series of valves were closed to fully seal off the section of failed pipeline, she said.
Opper also requested information from the company concerning the pipeline’s pressure and flow rate beginning 48 hours before the spill through Monday. Exxon Mobil was asked to provide an answer by next Monday.
Because much of the oil was swept away by the river, only 1 to 5 percent of the oil is expected to be recovered.
As of Tuesday, 942 barrels of oily water had been collected by cleanup crews. That equates to roughly 9 barrels of oil, said Steve Merritt, the Environmental Protection Agency’s on-scene coordinator for the disaster.
State officials on Tuesday said a new area with oil was found near Hysham, about 90 miles from the pipeline failure. However, company representatives and EPA officials still say most of the damage from the spill is within the first 30 miles downstream of the line.
Teams of trained spotters have been cruising sections of the river in boats over the past few days after water levels finally began to recede. Merritt said those teams have found moderate to light oil “staining” on vegetation.
In some cases, Merritt said small quantities of oil could be left in place if removing it would result in even more damage.
About 70 protesters occupied the governor’s office Tuesday, angry over the spill and plans to build another pipeline in the state, Keystone XL, that would carry oil from the tar sands in Canada. The group banged drums and chanted such slogans as “the Yellowstone was the first. If Exxon stays it will get worse.”
Gov. Brian Schweitzer told the group he would not cede to their demands. They then started playing the piano and dancing on the big table in the governor’s reception room in apparent frustration with the direction of the meeting.
Schweitzer left the room and security personnel watched the group while much of the work in the governor’s office continued normally.
© Copyright 2011 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Three dead, three wounded in Seattle shootings 
The_Seer on July 12 at 1:40 p.m.
One of the U.S.’s last great rivers that remains un-dammed. Why would Exxon fib about the amount of the spill? Haven’t they always been sterling stewards of the environment and committed to completely cleaning up their mistakes?
MrNatural on July 12 at 3:08 p.m.
Well it’s pretty obvious to me that regardless of all the fancy cleanup equipment and well intended emergency drills with the booms and the pads and smart pig baloney that these oil companies parade around as the cure all for spills in order to get permission to drill and lay pipe in environmentally sensitive areas…It’s damn obvious that this crap does NOT work. It is also obvious that oil companies are the quintessential BS artists when downplaying their toxic spooge upon our nation’s environment.
I anticipate that we will experience more of these incidents from neglected infrastructure not to mention the potential for nefarious causes. All the assurances don’t mean a damn thing without locating these facilities in environmentally safe areas, continual safety upgrades and secondary and even triple containment. And any moron knows locating a pipeline within a rivers flood zone is a stupid risky thing to do…unless you don’t give a damn as long as you make record profits.
This makes me mad as hell…
liberal_in_right_wing_land on July 12 at 3:39 p.m.
What an oil company lying about the size of their own oil spill. NO WAY! This is a great American company and they wouldn’t do ANYTHING to harm the environment.
Oh wait….they also were responsible for the Exxon Valdez spill? No, way not one of America’s great corporations that can do not wrong.
Maybe if we give them some more tax breaks they would be able to afford cleaning up the oil spill with something other than paper towels.