Arrow-right Camera

Nation/World

GOP hopefuls go easy on rivals in first debate

Tue., June 14, 2011

From left, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty and businessman Herman Cain stand on stage before the Republican presidential debate at St. Anselm College in Manchester, N.H., on Monday. (Associated Press)
From left, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty and businessman Herman Cain stand on stage before the Republican presidential debate at St. Anselm College in Manchester, N.H., on Monday. (Associated Press)

Candidates focus most of their rhetorical ire on President Obama

MANCHESTER, N.H. – Mitt Romney tried hard to stay above the Republican debate battle, Tim Pawlenty tried mightily to boost his stature and Michele Bachmann came on strong.

Everyone else at Monday night’s GOP candidate debate scrambled to stand out in the crowded field.

The first debate of the 2012 presidential cycle in this state, which traditionally holds the nation’s first primary, lacked the kind of barbs and bile these affairs usually generate. Romney, the clear New Hampshire poll front-runner, didn’t get challenged hard on health care and abortion, two areas where critics say he’s changed his views over the years.

As governor of Massachusetts, he signed into law a near-universal health care plan considered a model for the 2010 federal health law championed by President Barack Obama.

Pawlenty, the former Minnesota governor, had a clear opening to tear into Romney, but didn’t. Pressed to repeat his charge – uttered only a day earlier – that the two plans were “Obamneycare,” Pawlenty wouldn’t confront Romney. When pushed, he said he used the term because Obama compared his health care plan to Romney’s.

“Using the term ‘Obamneycare’ was a reflection of the president’s comments that he designed Obamacare on the Massachusetts health care plan,” Pawlenty said.

Romney was only gently challenged on abortion. When he ran for governor in 2002, he left abortion rights groups convinced that he would protect such rights. He has said that while he has always opposed abortion personally, he backed Massachusetts’ voters’ right to set their own legal standard.

Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, a longtime abortion opponent, said voters should note the “authenticity of a candidate” on such an issue.

Romney countered that he’s “firmly pro-life.” No one else challenged him.

The two-hour debate offered little drama, other than an announcement by a resolute, tough-talking Bachmann, a three-term Minnesota congresswoman, that she has taken the formal steps to become a presidential candidate.

The debate had several story lines.

Foremost was the effort by Romney and Pawlenty, who have appeal to the kinds of independent voters who can help win general elections, to remain statesmanlike and stay away from appearing extreme.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich also was closely watched. His campaign nearly imploded last week as his top staff abruptly quit, saying he was not putting in the time or effort needed for a presidential run.

Gingrich stirred the ire of conservatives recently when he called House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s plan to dramatically revamp Medicare “right-wing social engineering.” Monday, he said there are “certain things I’d do different” than Ryan.

The debate also was a battle between four more conservative candidates vying to become the favorite of the GOP’s right wing. Scrapping for that mantle were Bachmann, Santorum, businessman Herman Cain, and to some degree, libertarian Rep. Ron Paul of Texas.

Outrage was often their weapon. Bachmann charged Obama “took away $500 billion, a half-trillion dollars out of Medicare, shifted it to Obamacare to pay for younger people, and it’s senior citizens who have the most to lose in Obamacare.”

That figure is the savings projected by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office from the 2010 law’s plan to save money in the Medicare program by creating more efficient ways of paying for care. Seniors, Democrats insist, should see few changes in their care.

The candidates largely agreed on two points: Obama has presided over an economic disaster, and the 2010 health care law, championed by Democrats, is a mess.

Candidates usually have three aims at these early affairs.

The first is to give the impression they’re serious presidential material. Some are on their way to gaining that status; a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll taken June 3-7, showed that Romney and Rudolph Giuliani, the former New York City mayor who is not in the race, were mentioned by three of four Republicans as qualified for the job.

The second purpose of these early debates is to allow the public, particularly the insiders who most closely watch and analyze these events, to become familiar with – and like – the candidates.

Cain, Bachmann, Santorum and Pawlenty aren’t well-known, according to polls, and offered quick resumes.

“I am not a politician. I am a problem solver with over 40 years of business and executive experience,” Cain declared at the outset. Santorum recalled how, as a congressman, he represented the working-class Pittsburgh area. Bachmann noted, “I’m a former federal tax litigation attorney. I’m a businesswoman,” as well as a “wife of 33 years” with five children and 23 foster children.

The third aim of candidates is to gain momentum. One of the next big tests of strength will be their ability to raise money – fundraising reports are due next month.


 

There are 18 comments on this story »





>>