March 1, 2011 in Idaho

Centerpiece of Idaho school reform plan may be dead

By The Spokesman-Review
Betsy Russell photo

House Education Chairman Bob Nonini, R-Coeur d’Alene, presides over the House Education Committee hearing Tuesday on two school reform bills, SB 1108 on teacher contracts and SB 1110 on teacher pay for performance. The committee took four hours of testimony, and then broke until the following morning.
(Full-size photo)

BOISE - The centerpiece of Idaho’s controversial school reform plan may be dead for this year, senators indicated late Tuesday, even as separate bills on teacher contracts and pay move through hearings in the House.

The main bill, SB 1113, was pulled back to the Senate Education Committee last week after earlier squeaking through it on a 5-4 vote; on Tuesday, committee members said it’s not coming back.

The measure sought to raise Idaho’s class sizes in grades 4-12 and eliminate 770 teaching jobs in the next two years, to generate millions in savings that would be funneled into technology boosts, including laptop computers for every high school student, and a teacher performance pay plan.

“I don’t see any effort to move 1113 forward at this point,” said Senate Education Chairman John Goedde, R-Coeur d’Alene. Instead, the committee may work on legislation to establish a task force to work on issues raised by the bill and report back next year.

Sen. Chuck Winder, R-Meridian, who had voted in favor of the measure, said, “Hopefully the process can be established so that when the task force is done, the stakeholders feel like they did have some significant impact on the outcome.”

The reform package generated an unprecedented outpouring of public input against the bill, from thousands of calls and emails to lawmakers, to huge turnouts at public hearings, to rallies and demonstrations across the state. On Monday, hundreds of high school students walked out of class around the state to protest the plan.

State schools Supt. Tom Luna said late Tuesday that he’s still hoping some version of SB 1113 will pass, but he said, “There’s a reason these were put in three separate bills. I think they’re all three necessary to do the kinds of reform that we need in education, but the two bills that we’ve passed are monumental.”

The two other bills in the package, SB 1108 and SB 1110, both narrowly passed the Senate last week after a tense, five-hour-long debate; both are now pending in the House, where they’re expected to pass.

House Education Chairman Bob Nonini, R-Coeur d’Alene, who held hearings on both those bills Tuesday morning that ran for nearly four hours, said, “I think 1108 has merit on its own, if it is the only thing that’s brought forward, in trying to untie the hands of school districts.”

That measure removes most of teachers’ existing collective bargaining rights. It also removes a portion of the state’s current school funding formula that protects a school district’s funding when enrollment swings sharply from one year to the next, giving the district 99 percent of the state funding it received the previous year. Under SB 1108, that would be replaced by severance payments to teachers laid off in the fall due to drops in enrollment.

The third bill, SB 1110, establishes a performance-pay plan for teachers that would cost the state $38 million in its first year, 2013, and $51.3 million in each year after that. The class-size increases were supposed to generate the savings to pay for it.

But Nonini said his committee may choose to pass the bill anyway. “We could work on it next year and see how we … fund it in 2013,” he said.

Testimony at Tuesday’s hearing ran 6-1 against SB 1108 and 1110, but Nonini said he didn’t hear anything to alter his support for the two bills. The hearing will continue on Wednesday morning, with dozens more people signed up to testify. “I think there’s credibility in us going through this process,” Nonini said. “I think we need to let ‘em have their say, whether it changes our mind or not.”

Luna’s spokeswoman, Melissa McGrath, said late Tuesday, “These discussions are ongoing. It’s critical that we find a solution to that funding cliff and to the budget situation we’re in this year.” If just the two bills now in the House pass, she said, “It would mean that we found a little bit of cost savings in SB 1108, but the major issue facing us today with our budget, which is the funding cliff, has not been addressed.”

On Tuesday afternoon, Senate Education Committee members began turning their attention to how Idaho will fund schools next year, with a potential shortfall of up to $62 million. They queried representatives of education stakeholder groups on what they think of relaxing the state’s “use it or lose it” funding rule, with looming budget cuts. That rule requires certain levels of staffing at school districts as a condition of state funding.

Karen Echeverria, executive director of the Idaho School Boards Association told the senators, “We’ve said from the beginning the big thing for the trustees is flexibility at the local school district level to let them figure this out on their own.”

Goedde said, “The bottom line is if we don’t do anything, $62 million gets cut out of the budget and we could very well put that in local trustees’ laps to deal with as they see fit.”

There are four comments on this story. Click here to view comments >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email