Spokane7
58°
March 12, 2011 in Opinion
Everybody wins but Utah’s workers
Someone is missing at the celebration for the Utah Compact on immigration. Who could that be?
Latino activists, the Catholic Church, the Mormon Church, the Chamber of Commerce and the state’s political establishment – they’re all there, hailing the law that would let illegal immigrants pay a fine, then apply to the state for two-year work permits. In the meantime, the governor would seek a waiver for the program from the federal government.
But there are some empty chairs at the banquet table. Who’s not there? Oh, the workers aren’t there. They forgot to invite Utah’s workers! Now why wouldn’t they seek a thumbs-up from the folks they want to replace with guest workers from Mexico?
I can think of some reasons.
The Utah compact states:
“Utah is best served by a free-market philosophy that maximizes individual freedom and opportunity. We acknowledge the economic role immigrants play as workers and taxpayers. Utah’s immigration policies must reaffirm our global reputation as a welcoming and business-friendly state.”
What classic bedrock conservative principles! What a big-hearted “howdy” for newcomers from foreign lands! And I thought the compact’s backers were mainly fat cats trying to push through a cheap-labor deal.
Observe their application of “a free-market philosophy” to the work force. As it happens, the United States does not have a free market in labor – free market, as in letting anyone from any country walk in and take a job without proper documents. That’s why we have laws forbidding employers to hire illegal immigrants. If the plan is to turn America’s labor market into a global free-for-all, I think we need a conversation first.
Guest-worker advocates, writes an approving editorialist for the Wall Street Journal, believe that “the most responsible way to shrink the illegal alien population without hurting the local economy is by giving foreign nationals wider access to the state’s labor markets.” He calls the law’s opponents “immigration restrictionists.”
Gosh, Utah is now setting up a formal partnership with the Mexican state of Nuevo Leon to grease the pipeline of foreign laborers. Native-born and otherwise documented workers, hold your tongues. You don’t want to be called a “restrictionist,” do you?
Over on the left, the New York Times gushes over the “welcome contrast” Utah draws with the “xenophobic radicalism” of Arizona. Utah does avoid the serious flaw in Arizona’s law – letting police demand immigration papers from those merely suspected of being in the country illegally.
But the Times also likes this end-run around federal laws that limit the number of immigrants that may enter this country legally – laws designed to protect the wages and benefits of U.S. workers. How nice to treat the long-suffering low-skilled American as invisible and shroud that neglect in pious humanitarian sentiments.
The pro-compact alliance of businesses, cheap-labor conservatives, ethnic activists and church groups resembles the powerful coalition that tried to pass the grand immigration bargain a few years ago in Washington. That legislation went down in flames because the broader public saw it as heavy on amnesty and light on enforcement of existing immigration laws.
Make no mistake: America desperately needs immigration reform. And to work, it would have to pair an amnesty for most illegal immigrants with an airtight system to ensure that employers hire only legal workers. It would probably include a limited guest-worker program to serve the special needs of agriculture.
But it wouldn’t let employers call Mexico any time they can’t find takers for the wages they’re offering, however puny. And it would restore the federal government’s reputation as overseer of immigration policy.
Perhaps we can accurately call the Utah Compact “pro-immigrant and pro-business.” Sadly, it’s not pro-labor. But who asked the workers, anyway?
Froma Harrop is a columnist for the Providence Journal.
Trudy Rubin: Egyptians say no to Islamists 
mikeln on March 12 at 7:15 a.m.
The country is in the hands of facists. This will not last for long. People are becoming aware of this and it just will not fly. Stock up, it’s going to be a long, hard fought battle to rid ourselves of these greedy, power hungry pigs.
Rand on March 12 at 8:53 a.m.
I have my broad brush ready and I am glad that I don’t have to actually think about this. Anyone who is against what Utah is doing is RACIST!!!!
It sure feels good to not do a thing and pretend I am helping people. Being a liberal makes me feel so warm and fuzzy. Anyone who disagrees with my post is a racist.
greyhound2 on March 12 at 9:14 a.m.
American workers are being squeezed by Wall Street to drive down wages by outsourcing jobs overseas and flooding the internal labor market with imported labor. While Wall Street has almost all of the money, labor has almost all of the votes.
The same groups advocating amnesty should be the ones paying the costs of welfare, healthcare and education for illegals, not the county and state property owners.
Arch_Druid on March 12 at 11:42 a.m.
@Rand, if say Charles Krauthammer opposed the use of illegal immigration to take American jobs, would you engage in such an off the wall rant?
Guest workers and illegal aliens aren’t likely to stay here or become citizens here. Nor will any money they may make buttress the local economy. The only thing it is assured to do, is pad the bottom lines of business interests who actually hire them cheap.
On the other hand, who is most likely to buy the products in the state of Utah, only the citizens who actually reside in the state and are actually employed. Shouldn’t the first preference for buttressing local economies is to actually hire Americans to fill the jobs? Seems to me that’s what real conservatives would do. But when it comes to ideological radicals who are major H. bent on destroying capitalism; oh yeah, let’s hire the cheapest labor possible.
RaulBloodworth on March 12 at 9:30 p.m.
We need to bring in guest workers to help break the unions strangle hold over this country. Lower wages means lower prices for us all.
greyhound2 on March 14 at 3:43 p.m.
RaulBloodworth,
Not true. When Nike moved its tennis shoe operation to Malaysia, the basketball player who represented the company made more money than all of the workers in Malaysia combined. The tennis shoes, which the workers who made them could not afford to buy, still sold for over $45 for a pair, some of the most expensive available for a pair of tennis shoes in the country. Lower wages overseas does not translate into lower prices in the US. They were, however, able to plaster their label over all the jerseys worn by American athletes in football, basketball and baseball in a marketing ploy. Wearing a Nike label means you support ensalvement of workers overseas, mostly hijacked 14-year-old girls from the Phillipines.