March 24, 2011 in News

South Hill rapist Kevin Coe loses appeal

By The Spokesman-Review
 

Appellate judges today rejected South Hill rapist Kevin Coe’s claim that state prosecutors in his recent civil commitment trial should have been prohibited from presenting evidence from dozens of sexual attacks that never resulted in charges.

Coe had asked the Division III Court of Appeals to undo the civil commitment that’s expected to keep him locked up for the rest of his life under state laws allowing for the detainment of rapists deemed sexually violent predators by the juries.

The appellate attorney representing Coe, Casey Grannis, argued that Superior Court Judge Kathleen O’Connor erred in 2008 when she allowed evidence from several uncharged cases where women alleged that Coe raped them.

Coe also made an argument, through his attorney, of ineffective counsel at his civil commitment trial. But Judge Stephen Brown wrote extensively about each argument in finding against Coe and found no ineffective representation by defense attorney Tim Trageser.

“We reject his contentions and affirm,” Brown wrote of Coe’s arguments. He decision was concurred by Judges Laurel Siddoway and Dennis Sweeney.

The oral arguments in February followed more than 230 pages of briefs filed by Grannis and Assistant Attorney General Malcolm Ross, who represented the state in the trial in October 2008 where a jury determined that Coe was a sexually violent predator who was likely to reoffend if released.

Grannis argued that O’Connor should not have allowed much of the testimony by clinical psychologist Dr. Amy Phenix. Phenix testified early in the case that she reviewed 1,000 Spokane police reports documenting rapes more than 25 years ago and said 23 victims identified Coe as their attacker in crimes that occurred during the decade leading up to Coe’s 1981 arrest.

She also listed another 30 sex crimes in which the victims could not identify their attacker, but said she believed Coe was the perpetrator because of similarities to the other attacks.

At trial, O’Connor allowed evidence from about two dozen of those women to be presented to the jury.

“Evidence of the unadjudicated offenses at issue here was important to the State’s case,” Grannis wrote in court records. “Coe was unable to cross-examine the witnesses at issue. Coe had the right to attack the credibility of the unavailable witnesses and the veracity of their accounts by examining the witnesses themselves.”

But Ross pointed out that there was no evidence in the record that excluded Coe from those offenses that didn’t lead to charges.

“Dr. Phenix’s opinions that Coe is mentally ill and dangerous were supported by an extraordinary amount of evidence. (Twenty two) of 33 victims discussed at trial made some identification of Coe as the perpetrator who had sexually offended them,” Ross wrote. “Coe’s argument that Dr. Phenix was allowed to relate too much evidence to the jury is a tacit admission of the amount of evidence the State adduced.”

The arguments come 30 years after Coe’s arrest in 1981, following a string of dozens of rapes attributed to the South Hill rapist.

A jury convicted Coe of four rapes, but all of those convictions were overturned on appeal because Spokane police detectives used hypnosis during interviews with witnesses. Former Spokane County Prosecutor Don Brockett refiled the charges, and a second jury in 1985 convicted Coe of three of the original four rape charges.

The state Supreme Court overturned two of those convictions in 1988 on the same hypnosis issue. It left Coe with a single conviction for which he served 25 years in prison. Just before his release, the state announced its intent to civilly commit Coe as a sexually violent predator.

Coe remains incarcerated at the state’s Special Commitment Center on McNeil Island, where he has been incarcerated since his release from prison in 2006.


There are 21 comments on this story. Click here to view comments >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email