May 2, 2011 in Nation/World

NATO doubts Libyan claims

Strike hit control center, officials say
Nancy A. Youssef McClatchy

Al Arab
(Full-size photo)

BENGHAZI, Libya – NATO has found no evidence to support claims by the Libyan government that an airstrike in Tripoli killed Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi’s youngest son and three grandchildren, two military officials said Sunday.

What the Libyan government called a residence – where Gadhafi’s son, Saif al Arab, and three grandchildren lived when the structure was struck Saturday night – was, in fact, a command and control center with a bunker underneath, the NATO and U.S. officials said. They spoke the condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly about NATO’s findings.

The officials also rejected suggestions that the attack targeted Gadhafi. Regime officials said Gadhafi and his wife were at the Tripoli home of their son, when the airstrike took place. Both escaped unharmed.

“We have seen no evidence of civilian casualties,” the NATO official said. “We do not target individuals and have no real way of knowing who is inside.”

The officials said they couldn’t say the regime was lying, simply that they couldn’t confirm the claims. Privately, however, officials at the Pentagon suggested that the regime claimed that civilians and children died by a NATO strike to divide an already conflicted international community over its effort here. In Benghazi, the rebel capital, residents were dubious, noting that Gadhafi has said family members have died at the world community’s hands before.

After the U.S. attacked the regime’s military headquarters in 1986, Gadhafi said his adopted daughter had been killed. Even now, Libyans aren’t certain whether that’s true.

Regardless, the effects of the airstrike reverberated around the world, as Libyan officials showed a body they said was a victim of the attack, and the international community debated whether NATO’s air campaign was within the legal guidelines of the United Nations resolution authorizing the use of force to protect Libyan civilians.

NATO refused to say what kind of aircraft was involved in Saturday’s attack, saying it didn’t want to link the attack to one country.

Western officials have been divided in recent weeks over whether Gadhafi is a legitimate military target under the U.N. Security Council resolution that authorized the air campaign to protect civilians. U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said last week that NATO was “not targeting Gadhafi specifically” but that his command-and-control facilities – including a facility inside his Tripoli compound that was hit with airstrikes last Monday – were legitimate targets.

In an effort to answer skeptics, Libyan state television Sunday showed one adult body covered by the Libyan green flag and surrounded by praying mourners. But the face remained covered; either way, seeing a body isn’t enough for most Libyans, as most have never seen Gadhafi’s youngest son.

Saif al Arab, 29, was considered the least problematic of Gadhafi’s immediate family. He had no organizational ties to the Libyan government or military.

Thoughts and opinions on this story? Click here to comment >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email