May 18, 2011 in City

‘Motor tracks’ rules proposed

Panel looks at zoning for private off-road areas
By The Spokesman-Review
 
If you go

What: Spokane County Planning Commission public hearing on private “motor tracks”

When: 9 a.m. Thursday, May 26

Where: Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway Ave., next to the courthouse

New restrictions could be coming on the use of motorcycles, ATVs and other off-road vehicles on private property.

The Spokane County Planning Commission will take testimony next Thursday, May 26, on a proposal to regulate private “motor tracks” in unincorporated areas.

County officials are responding to complaints about several personal dirt tracks, some of which reportedly include elaborate off-road designs.

The proposed zoning code amendment would confine noncommercial tracks for motorcycles and off-road vehicles to rural and “rural resource” zoning categories, excluding the “rural activity center” zone.

While a commercial track requires a conditional use permit, private tracks are largely unregulated. Neighbors have complained the county noise ordinance is ineffective.

“Typically, by the time the sheriff gets there, the noise either isn’t happening or the people who are making it promise to stop,” said planner Bob Brock.

Also, he said the sheriff’s office must set priorities, and noise control is not at the top of the list.

Brock said complaints often focus on the intensity and duration of motor track use. They object to noise that is nearly constant for extended periods even if it doesn’t exceed the county noise standard.

Despite their limited authority, county code enforcement officers have responded to complaints about at least eight private tracks since 2004.

Brock said most of the complaints involve tracks that have been “machine-sculpted” to have “jumps, berms and whoop-de-do’s” – not simple dirt paths.

The proposed code change defines motor tracks as “any part of a parcel” that is used as a course for motorcycles, all-terrain vehicles or other off-road vehicles. It also specifies that a motor track doesn’t qualify as “community recreational facility.”

Where allowed, motor tracks must be no larger than two acres and they must be within parcels 10 acres or larger. Tracks would have to be at least 100 feet away from property lines and at least 250 feet from any neighbor’s house.

Tracks could operate only during daylight hours, no earlier than 8 a.m. and no later than 6 p.m. Use would be limited to people who live on the property.

Three comments on this story so far. Add yours!
  • ZagChuck on May 18 at 1:17 p.m.

    Another over-reach by the nanny state….
    Despite their limited authority, county code enforcement officers have responded to complaints about at least eight private tracks since 2004.” That’s 1.15 complaints per year…

    Do we really need new regulations to respond to ONE COMPLAINT PER YEAR?? The answer is clearly NO!!

    This is the direction our government continues to move, more regulation and less freedom for private property owners.

    Each new regulation also requires taxpayer dollars to enforce. Time to stop finding reasons to grow government, it’s already too large in every sense of the word.

    I also wouldn’t be surprised if this is a way for the county to diminish its’ competition, before it increases fees on county owned off road areas. Nothing like legislating against the private competition.

  • MrNatural on May 18 at 4:21 p.m.

    YES!…glad to see (and hear) that this uber annoying activity is getting some rules…the incessant noise of two stroke engines all day and in the quiet of the evening is maddening to say the least and worse than those darn jet skis. I’m not saying that a family shouldn’t ride motorcycles on their property. As a matter of fact I’m glad the kids are getting exercise instead of becoming “videe-its” but this activity requires tact and decorum in a suburban neighborhood.

  • Buick_65 on February 16 at 12:56 p.m.

    So you’re thinking we’ll legislate “decorum” and “tact”. What happened to talking to your neighbor, reasoning with him or her. Used to be we could work stuff like this out; now we just wuss out and whine to the sherrif or the planning commission. “Oh please mr. commissioner, stop the mean old motorcycles from going vroom vroom”.

You must be logged in to post comments.
Please create a profile or log in here.