November 23, 2011 in Nation/World

Appeals court protects Yellowstone grizzlies

Officials erred in delisting bear with food source at risk, panel says
Carol J. Williams And Julie Cart Los Angeles Times
 
Associated Press photo

A grizzly bear roams near Beaver Lake in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, in July. An appeals court said the bears should not have been delisted because of a beetle infestation threatening white- bark pine trees, a major food source.
(Full-size photo)

Then and now

• 1975: When they received protections under the Endangered Species Act, as few as 136 grizzlies survived in the Yellowstone region.

• Present day: There are 600 grizzlies across Montana, Wyoming and Idaho.

Conservationists touted a major victory Tuesday in their battle to protect Yellowstone grizzly bears when a federal appeals court ruled that wildlife managers erred when they removed Endangered Species Act protection from “one of the American West’s most iconic wild animals.”

The ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s 2007 decision to remove the bears from the endangered species list. The court cited climate change as having accelerated a beetle infestation destroying the bears’ vital white-bark pine food source – making the grizzly only the second wildlife species, after the polar bear, to earn protection in recognition of harm caused by global warming.

The three-judge panel took note of conservationists’ warnings that the loss of trees in the upper elevations in and around Yellowstone National Park would likely drive the grizzlies to forage in more populous areas, increasing confrontation between the omnivorous bears and the people and livestock in the lowlands.

Grizzlies have killed several tourists and hikers in recent years, forcing parks and wildlife officials to euthanize the bears in record numbers. About 75 grizzlies were killed or removed from the wild in 2010, according to a multi-agency study team.

The appellate panel said the wildlife agency “failed to adequately consider the impacts of global warming and mountain pine beetle infestation on the vitality of the region’s white-bark pine trees.” The jurists noted that warmer temperatures in recent years allowed the beetles to survive a seasonal die-off, leaving them to destroy 16 percent of the trees and damage more than 25 percent.

“It cannot reasonably be denied that white-bark pine loss presents at least a potential threat to the Yellowstone grizzly population,” said the 9th Circuit opinion written by Seattle-based Judge Richard C. Tallman, who called the bears “both revered and feared as a symbol of wildness, independence and massive strength.”

The extent of the white-bark damage is a point of debate for the Fish and Wildlife Service, but scientists studying the problem describe the infestation in apocalyptic terms.

“It’s unprecedented in its intensity and scale,” said Diana Tomback, a white-bark pine expert at the University of Colorado, Denver. “Studies show that the majority of watersheds in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem have been ravaged and there are lots of places where there is 90 percent-plus mortality of beetle-ravaged mature trees.”

Beetles attack trees by boring under the bark and dredging internal canals that host thousands of larvae. The carving eventually stresses the pines, turning them a vivid red.

“The practical effect of this ruling is that the Yellowstone grizzly bears retain their protections,” said Douglas Honnold, the EarthJustice lawyer in Bozeman, who argued the case for the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, a nonprofit conservation group. A federal judge in Montana and all three appellate judges agreed, Honnold said, that the federal agency “was acting irrationally in delisting in the face of this significant threat to the bears.”

Chris Servheen, the wildlife agency’s grizzly coordinator, was pleased that the panel, despite overturning the delisting, upheld the agency’s conservation strategy for the bears, which the official called a “gold-plated management plan.”

Servheen said the service intends to resubmit its arguments for removing endangered species protections from grizzlies, this time providing the white-bark pine analysis the court requested.

“We feel pretty comfortable with our science, but we will do a complete review of the data,” Servheen said.

Those who challenged removal of the Yellowstone grizzlies from protected status said the scientific data on the pine stocks has become dramatically more persuasive in the last few years.

“Since delisting, the Fish and Wildlife Service has said itself that white-bark pine should be listed independently as an endangered species,” said Andrew Wetzler, an attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, which was among the conservation groups to challenge the bears’ removal from “threatened” status.

“I think it reflects the growing recognition, not just by the courts but by the executive branch as well, that global warming is completely transforming natural places across the West,” Wetzler said. “Grizzlies are very large canaries in the coal mine, as are the trees that are dying across the West.”


There are five comments on this story. Click here to view comments >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email