Arrow-right Camera
Subscribe now

Can’t see Prop. 1 passing

Having read the Community Bill of Rights flier, I think the driving organization needs a name change such as No-Vision, Revisionist, Tunnel Vision, Double Vision, Blurred Vision, Pie-in-the-Sky Vision or Dimvision (thanks, Doug Clark).

The flier states “Envision a vibrant Spokane.” Reality dose to those who have drunk the Kool-Aid or are about to: Spokane’s vibrancy will cease with all the lawsuits that will come in order to clarify the extremely vague language of this worthless bill. Do you want your tax dollars paying for city attorneys’ time and effort in court? I’d rather see another potholed road fixed, personally.

Vibrancy? Business will leave the city in a hurry for a more friendly place to do business, and with businesses leaving Spokane, what do you think that will do to your personal taxes to make up for the loss of taxes such businesses now pay?

Proposition 1 (Community Bill of Rights) is bad policy and bad for Spokane jobs. Let’s do better than two years ago, when Envision was defeated by 75 percent of voters, and vote this skunk of a bill down 100 percent.

Alene Lindstrand

Spokane



Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-3815

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy