October 27, 2011 in Nation/World

Flat-tax pitches dominate Republican hopefuls’ rhetoric

Romney says he’ll update economic proposal following plans from Perry, Cain
Steven Thomma McClatchy
 

WASHINGTON – The Republican Party is catching flat-tax fever, setting up an election-year fight with Democrats over whether wealthier Americans should pay more taxes or get tax cuts.

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney became the latest to punch the tax button Wednesday, telling a Virginia audience that he’ll soon update his economic proposal to spell out how to flatten the tax code.

A day earlier, rival Rick Perry proposed an optional flat 20 percent tax on income. Both followed Herman Cain’s pitch for a flat 9 percent income tax as part of his 9-9-9 plan, which helped him jump to the top tier of candidates for the party’s 2012 nomination. Newt Gingrich and Michele Bachmann also support a flat tax.

A flat tax – so called because it would set one tax rate for all income groups while taking away many or all deductions – would simplify taxes. It also would almost certainly give big tax cuts to wealthy Americans. Republicans say cutting taxes, especially on the wealthy, helps spur investment, economic growth and hiring.

At the same time, most of the Republican candidates propose other changes that also would mean big tax cuts for high-income Americans, such as eliminating taxes on dividend income or capital gains, and eliminating the estate tax, which Republicans call the “death tax.”

Their push comes at the same time that Democratic President Barack Obama is pushing to raise taxes on higher-income Americans. He has proposed raising taxes on those making more than $200,000 and has endorsed a push by Senate Democrats to raise taxes on income above $1 million.

The debate comes as new data show that the wealthiest Americans have greatly increased their share of U.S. income in recent decades. The richest 1 percent had 17 percent of American income in 2007, more than double their 8 percent share in 1979, according to a report this week from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

Protest over growing income inequality is also among the issues driving Occupy Wall Street and similar protests around the country.

There’s little doubt that the Republican presidential candidates’ proposals would cut taxes on the wealthy.

Most would eliminate taxes on all or some profits on investments. Most such taxes now are paid by wealthier Americans.

Most also would eliminate the estate tax, which applies to estates of $7 million or more and is paid by about 3,270 families each year, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, a joint project of the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute, center-left think tanks in Washington.

“These are really wealthy families,” said Roberton Williams, an analyst at the Tax Policy Center.

A flat tax on income would take away some deductions but lower the rate. Perry, for example, would cut it to 20 percent. Gingrich would cut it to 15 percent. The wealthiest Americans now pay a 35 percent marginal rate on income above $379,950. A detailed analysis by the Tax Policy Center found that the Cain plan would mean an average tax cut of $455,000 for those with incomes above $1 million.

In 1996, Romney criticized a flat tax proposal as a boon to the rich, going so far as taking out newspaper ads in early primary states to criticize the proposal from Steve Forbes, a Republican presidential candidate.

“It’s a tax cut for fat cats,” Romney said then.

When he announced his economic agenda this year, Romney said he would pursue a “long-term goal” of a “flatter, fairer, simpler structure.” But he also said he wouldn’t change any of the existing personal income tax rates.

On Wednesday in Fairfax, Va., he said, “I’ll lay out some additional ways to make the tax code more flat.”

While the Republican tax proposals would give tax cuts to the wealthy, the candidates have backed away from the appearance of raising taxes on lower-income Americans.

Cain at first denied that his plan would raise taxes on poorer Americans, then changed it after the Tax Policy Center found that 84 percent of taxpayers would pay more under Cain’s plan.

Gingrich notably would keep the earned income tax credit, which helps lower-income families offset payroll taxes for Medicare and Social Security. “Preserving the EITC and child tax credit are critical to ensure that the optional flat tax system does not unfairly target low-income Americans,” Gingrich says in a website chart comparing his flat tax proposal with Perry’s.

Romney points to his proposal to limit tax cuts on dividends and capital gains to incomes below $250,000. “My view is that a key to the tax policy is to reduce the tax burden on the people who have been hurt most by the Obama economy, and that’s the middle class,” he said Wednesday.

Gingrich and others have noted, however, that the limit would mean little because people below that threshold pay few taxes on dividends and capital gains.

And Perry would give all taxpayers the option of sticking with the current tax system, meaning that no one would have to pay more than they would under today’s rules.


There are 28 comments on this story. Click here to view comments >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email