August 1, 2012 in Idaho
Court clears North Idaho man of 3 felony charges
BOISE - A Kootenai County man has been cleared of three felony charges, after the Idaho Court of Appeals ruled a jury didn’t have sufficient evidence to conclude he had a gun when he angrily confronted friends of his ex-girlfriend in 2010 after vandalizing their home.
David Loren Curry was convicted of burglary, aggravated assault and unlawful possession of a firearm, with a sentence enhancement added for being a persistent violator; the burglary charge was based on the argument that he entered a garage with the intent of threatening the occupants with a deadly weapon.
The friends said Curry kept …
You have viewed 20 free articles or blogs allowed within a 30-day period. FREE registration is now required for uninterrupted access.
Registration Required
- log in to your Spokesman.com account for unlimited viewing and commenting access.
- Don't have a Spokesman.com account? Create a Spokesman.com profile and register for FREE access.
-
S-R Media, The Spokesman-Review and Spokesman.com are happy to assist you. Contact Customer Service by email or call 800-338-8801
BOISE - A Kootenai County man has been cleared of three felony charges, after the Idaho Court of Appeals ruled a jury didn’t have sufficient evidence to conclude he had a gun when he angrily confronted friends of his ex-girlfriend in 2010 after vandalizing their home.
David Loren Curry was convicted of burglary, aggravated assault and unlawful possession of a firearm, with a sentence enhancement added for being a persistent violator; the burglary charge was based on the argument that he entered a garage with the intent of threatening the occupants with a deadly weapon.
The friends said Curry kept his hand in his pocket, and one said he saw him partly remove a black object that appeared to be the barrel of a gun. However, no proof was found that Curry actually had a gun, and he never threatened to shoot or said he was armed.
Judge Sergio Gutierrez, writing for the majority in a 2-1 decision, wrote, “We conclude the evidence was insufficient to support an inference beyond a reasonable doubt that Curry had a deadly weapon.”
In a dissent, Judge John Melanson wrote that it could still be aggravated assault if the victim thought Curry had a gun, even if he didn’t, so he favored upholding the convictions for aggravated assault and burglary.
Curry was separately convicted of malicious injury to property for the vandalism, which he admitted. He was represented in his appeal by the Boise law firm of Nevin, Benjamin, McKay & Bartlett.

Spokane7
Win big with the NEW Spokane7!
Celtic Woman is coming to Spokane
Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.
You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.
comments powered by Disqus