Israeli court rejects activist’s family’s suit
Bulldozer driver killed woman in Gaza
HAIFA, Israel – An Israeli court on Tuesday cleared the military of wrongdoing in the death of a young American activist who was crushed by an Israeli bulldozer during a protest in the Gaza Strip nearly a decade ago, rejecting claims by her parents that the driver acted recklessly.
The verdict came after a seven-year legal battle waged by the family of Rachel Corrie, whose death remains a powerful symbol on both sides of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
For pro-Palestinian activists, Corrie has become a rallying cry and vivid image of what they say is Israel’s harsh repression of the Palestinians. In Israel, she is viewed as a tragic, manipulated figure who naively put herself into harm’s way in a fit of idealism.
The family said it was considering an appeal to the Israeli Supreme Court but wanted to examine the full verdict before deciding.
Corrie, who was 23, was crushed to death in March 2003 as she tried to block an Israeli military bulldozer in the southern Gaza town of Rafah. The incident occurred at the height of a Palestinian uprising, a time of heavy fighting between the military and Palestinian militants.
Corrie’s parents filed their civil suit two years later after an internal army investigation ruled the death an accident and said the bulldozer driver and other military personnel in the area acted properly.
In Tuesday’s verdict, Judge Oded Gershon backed the military’s version of events. Corrie “put herself in a dangerous situation,” calling her death “the result of an accident she brought upon herself.” He also said the military investigation was handled properly.
Corrie’s family, from Olympia, appeared devastated by the verdict.
“We are, of course, deeply saddened and deeply troubled by what we heard today,” said her mother, Cindy, 64, a homemaker and musician. “The state has worked extremely hard to make sure the full truth about my daughter is not exposed, and those responsible for killing her are not accountable.”
The family sought a symbolic $1 judgment, in addition to the $200,000 they say they have spent on legal expenses over the years.