December 23, 2012 in Letters, Opinion

Review Second Amendment


Something is wrong in our country. You can be jailed for possession of marijuana or casual overdose of alcoholic beverages, but it is OK for a mentally disturbed individual to possess an arsenal of sophisticated automatic firearms.

Our Constitution’s Second Amendment qualified arms as those necessary to support the militia, who at that time faced British troops armed with single-shot, hand-loaded weapons. Utilization of modern automatic weapons in the cause of national home defense is remote indeed.

Our interpretation of Second Amendment language can surely consider 21st-century conditions, without being a threat to my ownership of sporting firearms.

W. Robert Schwandt

Spokane Valley

Get stories like this in a free daily email

Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus