February 9, 2012 in Nation/World

Battling over birth control

Both sides seize issue to increase support, cash
Lisa Mascaro Tribune Washington bureau
 
Associated Press photo

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., center, flanked by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, right, and Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H. criticizes birth control provisions in the health care plan.
(Full-size photo)

WASHINGTON – The Obama administration’s new requirement that most health insurance plans provide contraceptive services has exploded into a high-octane political weapon, with combatants on both sides scrambling to score points among the electorate and gin up fundraising from their most ardent supporters.

In Congress and on the campaign trail Wednesday, Republicans attacked the rule as another example of government overreach, Exhibit A in the case against President Barack Obama’s health care law, while Democrats asserted the GOP was trying to turn back the clock on women’s rights.

House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, a Catholic, fueled the political firestorm by making a rare floor speech vowing to block the requirement that most faith-based employers, including Catholic ones, offer contraception, regardless of their religious beliefs. Churches and other houses of worship are exempt.

The campaign of GOP presidential contender Mitt Romney said the rule “compels religious institutions to violate the tenets of their own faith,” and Romney vowed to strike it down.

Democrats and Republicans used the controversy to appeal for contributions from their traditional political bases, a strategy that carries risks as well as rewards. At a time when independents and moderates can sway general elections, turning up the heat on a social issue could prove distracting and annoying to voters who are more concerned about the sluggish economy.

Amid the rising clamor, administration officials are exploring the possibility of implementing the rule so that religiously affiliated employers could offer supplemental policies, known as riders, for contraception or direct workers to insurance companies that sell such riders.

Even if Catholic voters and independents agree with the White House on substance, the administration doesn’t want to appear insensitive to the concerns of the Catholic Church.

Women’s groups would be likely to vigorously oppose any alteration of the rule.

“It’s absolutely amazing in the year 2012 there is controversy over women’s access to birth control,” said Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill. “One’s health benefit should not depend on who the boss is.”

Republican leaders on Capitol Hill, although emphasizing that their top priority remains jobs, focused escalating rhetoric, and most of the day’s attention, on the administration’s birth control policy.

“This attack by the federal government on religious freedom in our country cannot stand and will not stand,” Boehner said.

But polls indicate that voters, even Catholic ones, agree that contraceptives should be offered by health plans, even those of faith-based employers. That gives Democrats hope they can benefit from the high-stakes battle.

“This makes Republicans look more extreme,” said Eddie Vale, a spokesman for Protect Your Care, a health advocacy organization that has been leading attacks on GOP candidates opposed to the new health care law.

The contraceptive rule takes effect in August, but the administration has granted religiously affiliated organizations an extra year to implement it.

The rule requires that all health plans provide preventive healthcare services, which include cancer screening and wellness exams as well as contraception, without imposing cost-sharing, such as co-pays or deductibles, on employees. The administration already has granted narrow exemptions from the rule for churches, other houses of worship and religious organizations at which employees primarily share the same faith.

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus