BOISE – As Idaho moves toward transferring hundreds of state-owned cabin sites on scenic Priest Lake to private owners through land exchanges or auctions, the state wants to protect the value of the land – and nearby state endowment land – through restrictive covenants.
Most Priest Lake cabin owners, who now own their cabins but not the land, are on board with the idea, but some object.
“We don’t want them,” wrote cabin owner Tom Wielgos in a letter to the Idaho State Land Board, decrying the “bureaucracy” that would come with restrictions enforced by a homeowners association. An anonymous email to the board questioned whether the restrictions would violate “fundamental freedoms.”
Those restrictions would keep in place current regulations limiting the sites to single-family homes rather than condos, resorts or commercial development; ban mobile homes; require earth tones and “unobtrusive” construction; and require erosion control and defensible space to lower wildfire risk. The association also would oversee road maintenance.
“We recognize that a very minor percentage of Priest Lake lessees may not understand nor appreciate the importance of putting restrictions on the cottage sites,” said Denny Christenson, president of the Priest Lake State Lessees Association, who told the Land Board on Tuesday that his group represents 312 of the 354 lessees. “The failure to do so could be catastrophic to the long-term beauty and character of one of Idaho’s true treasures.”
Restrictive covenants aren’t being proposed for similar cabin sites on Payette Lake to the south, but that’s because those cabin sites are within the McCall city area of impact, subjecting them to restrictive zoning regulations.
Several Lands Department officials met with state Sen. Shawn Keough, R-Sandpoint, in April, and in a follow-up letter, department Deputy Director Kathy Opp wrote that restrictive covenants would be imposed in the 15 neighborhoods of Priest Lake cabins only if 100 percent of residents in each neighborhood want them.
However, Opp told the board on Tuesday that board members – the state’s top elected officials – should decide that.
“As a matter of law, there is no requirement to include covenants, conditions and restrictions,” Deputy Attorney General Clive Strong told the board. “But as a matter of policy, it is the policy choice of this board.”
Christenson said 100 percent agreement among cabin owners would be “an impossible threshold to attain, for all but the very smallest of neighborhoods. … We are opposed to it. It alone would prevent our objective to maintain the existing character and land values of the lake.”
Gov. Butch Otter, who chairs the Land Board, requested a formal legal opinion from Idaho Attorney General Lawrence Wasden, who said he can deliver one within a week. The Land Board then will hold a special meeting to decide on the covenants and restrictions.
Owners in each neighborhood could make future changes to the restrictions by a two-thirds vote.
sponsored According to two 2015 surveys, 62 percent of Americans do not have enough savings to handle an unexpected emergency, much less any long-term plans.