Arrow-right Camera
Subscribe now

Romney rationale unconvincing

The fact is that many of my neighbors here in Spokane support Mitt Romney in the coming presidential election. I am curious. The two main reasons Romney gives for supporting him are that Barack Obama has been president while the leavings of the Great Recession continue, and that as a wealthy businessman he (Romney) would be better qualified to repair the country.

And yet Romney says that his leave of absence from Bain to volunteer for the Salt Lake Olympics, while still drawing a CEO salary from Bain, should exempt him from blame for the dealings of Bain. Further, the presidents who led us out of major wars and depressions were not businessmen (Washington, Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt).

Clearly, just being a rich businessman does not mean that you can be a good president. Herbert Hoover was rich and a successful businessman. The Great Depression started on his watch. George W. Bush is rich and a businessman. The Great Recession started on his watch.

If what Romney says does not show that he would be better for president, what does?

Allan deLaubenfels

Spokane Valley



Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-3815

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy