July 22, 2012 in Sports

Anti-doping authorities kick into high gear in London

Stephen Wilson Associated Press
 

LONDON – Before a starting gun has been fired or a medal awarded, one of the most intense competitions of the London Olympics is already being waged behind the scenes.

From training grounds across the world, to rooms in the athletes village, to border checkpoints around the U.K., the cat-and-mouse game between drug cheats and the doping police is in full swing.

The goal: to deter or catch dopers before they line up to compete. And those who slip through the crackdown will face the most extensive anti-doping program in Olympic history, with more tests and more advanced testing techniques.

“The more cheats we can catch is the better for the clean athletes,” IOC President Jacques Rogge said.

The IOC and London organizers will be conducting more than 5,000 urine and blood tests overall, up from 4,770 in Beijing four years ago. Nearly 40 percent of the tests are being carried out before the games start on Friday to try to nab athletes when they’re more likely to be doping.

During the games, which run until Aug. 12, the top five finishers – plus two other athletes chosen at random – will be tested. Athletes are also subject to surprise out-of-competition controls at any time and any place. Samples will again be saved for eight years to allow for retroactive testing.

“I think it’s the tightest net we have ever had,” IOC vice president Thomas Bach said.

The official Olympic testing program went into effect on Monday with the opening of the athletes village.

A nondescript building in the northern suburb of Harlow houses the doping lab where an athlete’s reputation can be ruined by a positive result. The lab – operated by GlaxoSmithKline and headed by Professor David Cowan of the Drug Control Center at King’s College, London – will operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and test up to 400 samples a day for more than 240 banned substances.

The IOC will act quickly on any positive results, setting up a disciplinary committee to investigate and hold a hearing. If found guilty of doping, athletes face disqualification from the games, loss of any medals and public shame.

The 2004 Athens Olympics produced the highest number of doping cases at any games – 26, more than double the previous high of 12 in Los Angeles in 1984. Six medalists, including two gold winners, were caught in Athens from among 3,600 tests.

That number could still rise: IOC medical commission chairman Arne Ljungqvist said this week that he is investigating up to five suspected positive results uncovered in the recent retesting of Athens samples.

In Beijing four years ago, there were 14 positive tests among athletes and six among horses in the equestrian competition. Later, retests of the Beijing samples caught five more athletes for use of CERA, an advanced version of the blood-boosting drug EPO. Rashid Ramzi of Bahrain was retroactively stripped of his gold medal in the 1,500 meters.

“The fact that people know that samples can be analyzed again is a big deterrent,” Ljungqvist said. “If athletes don’t get caught now they may be caught tomorrow.”

More and more, anti-doping authorities are using intelligence and cooperation with law enforcement agencies to go after the cheats.

At the Turin Winter Olympics in 2006, Italian police – acting on a tip from the IOC – raided the lodgings of the Austrian cross-country and biathlon teams, seizing doping substances and equipment.

“We will not hesitate to work with public authorities and police forces as we have done in Turin when needed,” Rogge said.

Suspected dopers are being targeted for testing. UK Anti-Doping, the national agency set up in 2009, operates a 24-hour anonymous hotline for whistleblowers to provide information about doping and trafficking.

© Copyright 2012 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus