CEO: Bank may revoke bonuses
Execs responsible for $2 billion loss may also lose stock
WASHINGTON – JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon told Congress on Wednesday that senior bank executives responsible for a $2 billion trading loss will probably have some of their pay taken back by the company.
Under bank policy, stock and bonuses can be recovered from executives, even for exercising bad judgment, Dimon told the Senate Banking Committee. The policy has never been invoked, he said, but he strongly suggested that it will be.
“It’s likely that there will be clawbacks,” he said.
Among the most likely candidates would be Ina Drew, JPMorgan’s chief investment officer, who left the bank days after Dimon disclosed the loss on May 10. Drew oversaw the trading group responsible for the $2 billion loss.
Dimon, under close questioning about his own role in setting up the investment division responsible for the mess, declared: “We made a mistake. I’m absolutely responsible. The buck stops with me.”
The trading loss, disclosed May 10, has raised concerns that the biggest banks still pose risks to the U.S. financial system, less than four years after the financial crisis in the fall of 2008.
Dimon’s reputation for cost-cutting and perceived mastery of risk, particularly during the crisis, earned him respect in Washington. JPMorgan Chase weathered the crisis with relatively little damage.
At every turn before the committee, Dimon responded easily and in rapid-fire style to questions. He sounded notes of contrition – “We should have gotten it earlier” – but also defended the bank and his own criticism of some financial regulation.
Other than a few critical jabs from a couple of Democratic senators, the panel’s treatment of Dimon was a gentle contrast to that received by other Wall Street executives in recent years on Capitol Hill.
Lloyd Blankfein, the CEO of Goldman Sachs, was roughed up at a hearing by a Senate investigative panel over allegations that the firm steered investors toward mortgage securities it knew would likely fail.
In December, former New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine endured grueling questioning by three different committees over the collapse of the brokerage firm MF Global, which he had led as CEO.
And a parade of financial titans were derided and grilled by congressional committees conducting autopsies of the financial crisis for the TV cameras.
On Wednesday, Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., told Dimon sympathetically that Congress manages to lose at least $2 billion every day. Referring to the bank, he said: “You appear to be in much better fiscal shape than we are as a country.”
“The intent here is really not to sit in judgment,” the senator said.
Far from crouching, Dimon struck a posture as something of a public advocate as the hearing ended. He urged Congress to act quickly to avoid the so-called fiscal cliff at the end of this year, when billions of dollars in tax cuts will expire and billions more in automatic government spending cuts will take effect.
“I think we’d better do something now so we don’t create additional uncertainty among businesses and consumers,” Dimon said.
The start of the hearing was delayed by demonstrators in the room who shouted about stopping foreclosures. One shouted, “Jamie Dimon’s a crook.” At least a dozen people were escorted from the hearing room.
Dimon appeared serene during the outbursts, which lasted several minutes. At another point before the questioning began, he gave a broad smile.
Dimon contended that the trading loss, disclosed in a surprise conference call with reporters and banking analysts, was meant to hedge risk to the company and to protect it in case “things got really bad.”
Two Democrats on the committee, Sens. Charles Schumer of New York and Robert Menendez of New Jersey, expressed concern about what would have happened if the trading loss had occurred at a weaker bank.
JPMorgan Chase is the largest bank in the United States by assets and is considered among the strongest. Dimon often makes note of the bank’s “fortress balance sheet.”
But Menendez hypothesized about a larger loss, perhaps $50 billion, that creates a run on the bank “and that ultimately becomes the collective responsibility of each and every American.”
Menendez also challenged Dimon on his strenuous opposition to stricter financial regulation and noted that JPMorgan received a $20 billion taxpayer bailout loan at the depths of the 2008 crisis.
Dimon last September called new international standards for banks to hold larger cash cushions to protect against losses, which U.S. regulators also have proposed for U.S. banks, “anti-American.”
“You railed against us when we were in fact trying to pursue great capitalization of these banks,” Menendez said. And he reminded Dimon scoldingly: “It seems to me that the American people are a big part of helping to make your bank healthy.”
Dimon insisted that “We did not fight everything” and that there are elements of tougher financial regulation that he does support.
Dimon skated a fine line in talking about his specific role in relation to the bank’s trading operation. Asked whether he personally approved the investment office’s trading strategy, Dimon said, “I was aware of it, but I didn’t approve it.”
Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., who has received $10,000 since January 2011 from JPMorgan’s political action committee, the most any candidate has received, praised Dimon as one of the “best CEOs in the country for financial institutions.”
Still, he wondered: “You missed this. It’s a blip on the radar screen. But are these institutions today just too complex to manage?”
The so-called Volcker rule, which goes into effect in July, will prevent banks from making certain trades for their own profit. Banks won an exemption to trade to protect their broad portfolios, as Dimon has said JPMorgan was doing in this case.
Dimon told the committee, however, that “I have a hard time distinguishing it.” He allowed that “it’s possible” that the Volcker rule would have prevented the debacle at JPMorgan but said he didn’t know.
© Copyright 2012 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.