March 25, 2012 in Opinion

Michael Ferguson: Tax cuts alone not answer for Idaho

 

To hear supporters tell it, tax cuts will cure all that ails Idaho by launching a golden era of commerce and employment growth. They’d have a hard time proving it.

Idaho’s history tells a very different story. The simple truth is taxes pay for public services that benefit both businesses and households, and the majority of those services make people and businesses more productive. When we cut taxes, we starve that part of our economy. This is a good bargain only if the resources left in private hands are more productive than the resources taken from essential services. Our experience shows it’s a bad bargain.

Let’s look at what happened in the 1980s. Idaho had difficulty meeting its needs during a severe recession. Instead of pursuing an all-cuts strategy, the governor and Legislature made increased revenue part of the mix. They boosted the corporate income tax to 8 percent from 6.5 percent, the individual income tax to a top rate of 8.2 percent from 7.5 percent, and the sales tax to 5 percent from 3 percent. It was the reasonable thing to do.

The increases took place from 1983 to 1987. What followed over the next two decades was amazing.

In late 1987, Idaho’s economy recovered from a nearly decade-long slump. Year after year of robust growth followed. We skipped through the nation’s 1990-’91 recession, slowing only for the 2001 recession. Even then, Idaho’s dip was minor compared with that of most other states.

In stark contrast, in 2000, policymakers reversed course and began whittling away Idaho’s resources. The top individual income tax rate was reduced nearly to the pre-1987 level, and the corporate income tax rate was cut to 7.6 percent. Property taxes for both homeowners and businesses were slashed. The grocery tax credit was boosted.

When the recession hit, the Gem State was briefly cushioned by reserves built with a one-cent sales tax increase that lasted from 2003 to 2005. When that money ran out, instead of learning from the balanced approach that included more revenue, and not just cuts, policymakers went on a cutting spree. Reductions in public service jobs – in health care, transportation, higher education – were the steepest in the nation. Has it worked? Not so well. While job growth was robust during the two decades after taxes were raised, Idaho’s economy went into the ditch after taxes were cut.

Nonetheless, the governor set aside money in his latest budget for more tax cuts, and the House Committee on Revenue and Taxation has come up with a way to spend it. The plan would cut the top individual income tax rate to 7.4 percent from 7.8 percent and the corporate income tax rate to 7.4 percent from 7.6 percent, at a cost of $36 million.

Supporters say it will signal that Idaho is business-friendly. It will not. At best it will keep our state from regaining the substantial ground lost over the past few years. At worst, it could trigger more cuts for schools and colleges, job training and transportation – the very things that create a strong environment for job creation and make a state attractive to employers.

Michael Ferguson is the director of the Idaho Center for Fiscal Policy.

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus