Self-protection is complicated
I worry about arming myself and finding an intruder in my darkened house. I’d probably end up injured or dead, as I’d hesitate because of the current law and my reluctance to take a life. The intruder, however, probably wouldn’t hesitate using a gun or hammer in my hesitation (note Joseph Duncan).
The law has provided me a solution: First, I must request a time-out to the intruder’s actions for a few questions. Are you going to harm me or my wife or children? If his answer is affirmative, now I’m cleared to use my weapon. If his answer is negative, then I must observe willingly and would likely lose valuable possessions.
That’s because I’m 76 years old and don’t have the wherewithal to throw even a teenager out of the house. I can’t use a weapon and, of course, we know the police won’t respond.
My sincere caustic thanks to all the intellectuals who concocted this type of legal rationale for my protection.
Tom Boyd
Spokane Valley